Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"A smart phone is like your own personal tutor"


Jase

Recommended Posts

I have not seen this but it's not surprising...  

 

All a smartphone does is distract kids... hell, it distracts me.

 

I can't imagine sitting in a classroom now with my phone.  I would never pay attention.

 

 

I suppose there's some argument to be made for having net access while you're studying, but you don't need a smartphone for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ad I heard on the radio had kids talking like historical figures are posting on their facebook timeline.

 

IE "Alex Bell posted again.  Gee, just because he invented the telephone doesn't mean he can blow mine up all the time"

 

Then it goes into the personal tutor garbage.

 

Jimmies are rustled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if used properly a smart phone can have some educational purpose. I'm constantly googling things throughout the day on day things I'm pondering about. Like how things are made or how they work. And I tend use to auto correct as a means to learn how to spell certain words as opposed to a crutch that I have to have.  Not sure it would work in a school system though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all this stuff makes us more dumber, er!  Remember when we used to have to remember things....how's that for a line!!!

 

now there's no more arguing about who is right or anything...pop out the phone and google it.

 

damn you modern technology

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...