Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Listen up Seattle! You are now ON NOTICE!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

I do want to know the win/loss record for 'On Notice' games... I tried to search but many threads have been lost over the years. I am not questioning Zod's integrity, I want to know..

Regardless, you cannot deny the articulated confidence, OnNotice gets this place pumped up. Thanks Zod...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going with 24-17 good guys as well.

How are you going to put up 24 points on our defense? Sorry, I don't see that happening, AT ALL.

The Legion of Boom will light up "Smitty" and out elite defense will be ready. It's to bad we don't have Percy, cause then we would probably put up 50 points. But, since we don't, and all our receivers could arguably be one of your #2's, I will predict a score of 38-13 Seahawks.

Of course, I will be back and eat crow otherwise.. but that's a 5% chance that we lose.

Go hawks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How are you going to put up 24 points on our defense? Sorry, I don't see that happening, AT ALL.

The Legion of Boom will light up "Smitty" and out elite defense will be ready. It's to bad we don't have Percy, cause then we would probably put up 50 points. But, since we don't, and all our receivers could arguably be one of your #2's, I will predict a score of 38-13 Seahawks.

Of course, I will be back and eat crow otherwise.. but that's a 5% chance that we lose.

Go hawks!

Pssst... You haven't even seen your defense play under your new DC yet. Pipe down, junior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same goes for your OC.

 

We know that, thats why we aren't claiming a 38-7 victory like yourself.

 

 

Last time these teams played it was very close, and we are healthier and have improved more than seattle.

 

If I were you I would have more of a wait and see approach.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know that, thats why we aren't claiming a 38-7 victory like yourself.

Last time these teams played it was very close, and we are healthier and have improved more than seattle.

If I were you I would have more of a wait and see approach.

Improved? Yeah, I suppose on the front seven. Looks pretty good, you guys have the right to be optimistic.

Just like how Seahawk fans have the right to be optimistic. We don't have a lot of weak spots on our team in the first place (O-line I guess, but we have two all pros there, so idk).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Improved? Yeah, I suppose on the front seven. Looks pretty good, you guys have the right to be optimistic.

Just like how Seahawk fans have the right to be optimistic. We don't have a lot of weak spots on our team in the first place (O-line I guess, but we have two all pros there, so idk).

 

The entire league has a season's worth of film on Russell Wilson now and will prepare accordingly. If he can't up his game, there is a sophomore slump in his future.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our offense in '11 was 'elite' but was anything but last year. Change happens year to year.

Panthers could end with a better overall D than the Gayhawks

Come back around 430 on Sunday Sherman25 we'll have some Kleenex for you...actually, no we wont

Gayhawks? Clever. Gay slurs aren't cool, man. How will you have a better D? You guys don't even have a secondary as good as ours. We already have a really good front seven too.

You will be surprised, cats fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't believe it's as easy as saying that anyone believes that Rico had the 10th best day on offense. Grades are done in a vacuum inasmuch as they can be. By their very nature, skill positions are always going to account for more "production" in reference to stats, and RBs perhaps even more than WRs because they touch the ball more. You can't look at PFF's grading system, or any football grading/grading system (like perhaps Football Outsiders or Next Gen Stats), so simplistically. If a player has an excellent day, relative to his position, relative to his assignments, and relative to his number of snaps, then he should be graded highly. It's up to the reader (or the analyst, if you will) to put what you're seeing into context, and that's not only in relation to the grades, but the general situation (like whether a player is playing injured, who they're playing with or against---the general situation). Even the fact that (presumably) PFF or news outlets put out a list of the highest and lowest grades, that doesn't mean that said players were the most impactful of the day, it just means that they did or didn't do their job the best, based upon a certain set of parameters. PFF is a part of life for football analysts, talking heads, execs, coaches, players, and even fans (even if indirectly), all to varying degrees. It is a tool that is used by all 32 teams. Obviously it's not viewed so dismissively by franchises as a whole. Execs obviously don't look at it as a bunch of bozos making sh¡t up on the fly. Fans can berate it or swear by it, but it isn't going anywhere.  The only thing that I can tell you is that perspective and context matters.
    • Im not big in to PFF but their guys were raving about his blocking along with our other skill players in the run game. https://youtu.be/D4kL_N97cFQ?si=sJWSZCUA1bj5otyx  
×
×
  • Create New...