Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I think we'll be ok


MuMouey

Recommended Posts

I guess most of you didn't play any type of organized football growing up. You act like all 60 plays in a game are completely scripted and designed to be perfectly balanced. Of course there are specific plays we wish we could have back but all in all, we mostly out-played (or at least played equal to) a team that 50% of experts picked to represent the NFC in the super bowl.

What no one seems to realize is that teams customize their gameplan to match the situation. Yes we played a very conservative game, but had DWill not fumbled and we won 15-12, we would all be saying how much we love Shula for not getting "cute" and calling risky plays that could have cost us. We had 2 drives completely stopped due to Olsen drops and of course the fumble. Then add the 2 drives that ended at 4th and inches, and thats 5 extra drives we basically "left on the field."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess most of you didn't play any type of organized football growing up. You act like all 60 plays in a game are completely scripted and designed to be perfectly balanced. Of course there are specific plays we wish we could have back but all in all, we mostly out-played (or at least played equal to) a team that 50% of experts picked to represent the NFC in the super bowl.

What no one seems to realize is that teams customize their gameplan to match the situation. Yes we played a very conservative game, but had DWill not fumbled and we won 15-12, we would all be saying how much we love Shula for not getting "cute" and calling risky plays that could have cost us. We had 2 drives completely stopped due to Olsen drops and of course the fumble. Then add the 2 drives that ended at 4th and inches, and thats 5 extra drives we basically "left on the field."

 

One of those 4th and inches was due to an abysmal spot by the refs (who were extra stupid today.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not just this one game! It's been this way every game since 2011 opener! Can't keep making excuses!

Right now we are stuck under lousy leadership philosophy! We said they were young and will get better......they will not! Rivera is a stubborn mule and this game just showed we are in Part 3 of this losing culture

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess most of you didn't play any type of organized football growing up. You act like all 60 plays in a game are completely scripted and designed to be perfectly balanced. Of course there are specific plays we wish we could have back but all in all, we mostly out-played (or at least played equal to) a team that 50% of experts picked to represent the NFC in the super bowl.

What no one seems to realize is that teams customize their gameplan to match the situation. Yes we played a very conservative game, but had DWill not fumbled and we won 15-12, we would all be saying how much we love Shula for not getting "cute" and calling risky plays that could have cost us. We had 2 drives completely stopped due to Olsen drops and of course the fumble. Then add the 2 drives that ended at 4th and inches, and thats 5 extra drives we basically "left on the field."

 

The first bolded passage I agree with. I felt we outplayed the Seahawks most of the game. However, it can't be "mostly outplayed". We can't play great for three quarters and then fold, as the Panthers under Rivera have tended to do.

 

As to the second bolded part, I give Shula full credit for sticking with traditional running plays except for 2-4 read option plays and the odd quarterback dive. But I still think he didn't use Cam enough, and that includes the drops that we saw. Hopefully Shula will get better at balancing the run and pass, but IMO we ran too much today, even fully allowing for the Seahawks' pass defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first bolded passage I agree with. I felt we outplayed the Seahawks most of the game. However, it can't be "mostly outplayed". We can't play great for three quarters and then fold, as the Panthers under Rivera have tended to do.

As to the second bolded part, I give Shula full credit for sticking with traditional running plays except for 2-4 read option plays and the odd quarterback dive. But I still think he didn't use Cam enough, and that includes the drops that we saw. Hopefully Shula will get better at balancing the run and pass, but IMO we ran too much today, even fully allowing for the Seahawks' pass defense.

Yes you could say we "ran to much", but if DWill doesn't fumble, we win that game 8/10 times. Also, that DWill fumble WAS on a fake-option-type play

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...