Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike. M (like i know who that is) thoughts on our Offensive philosphy/ Cam


TbTeRRoR

Recommended Posts

I was referring to his locking-on tendencies, yes.  I will always love me some 89, but there are times Lafell is open that Cam just doesn't register.  Going to be interesting to see how we address OL and WR in the offseason since both could really use high picks.

 

Have you ever thought that maybe Cam knows who he's dealing with in respect to the receivers? Why does everything related to Cam has to be  something he has to fix? So darn boring after two years of the same unproven ish.  it's so easy to get hung up on things after the fact but I simply don't get why u folks try to turn everything Cam does into something he needs to fix. Everyone seems to want to play "Expert Know It Alls" when it comes to Cam.

 

You guys need to learn to move on and stop creating and pushing nonsense. IMO, all you're doing is giving those in the media fodder to work with, as if they need help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you ever thought that maybe Cam knows who he's dealing with in respect to the receivers? Why does everything related to Cam has to be  something he has to fix? So darn boring after two years of the same unproven ish.  it's so easy to get hung up on things after the fact but I simply don't get why u folks try to turn everything Cam does into something he needs to fix. Everyone seems to want to play "Expert Know It Alls" when it comes to Cam.

 

You guys need to learn to move on and stop creating and pushing nonsense. IMO, all you're doing is giving those in the media fodder to work with, as if they need help.

 

I worked in television for a year, so I can say television and/or other media's opinion of us is as relevant as we are to them.  

 

As to your opinion versus my opinion, let's consider this:  there's no other, better way for the rest of the receivers to prove themselves than to actually be given chances in a real game.  If they don't step up and continue to be irrelevant, then that finally answers what we need to know once and for all and next year's draft should feature two or three picks for that position.

 

Regardless of whose fault it is that there's usually only two real receiving options, seemingly, on any play, it's a problem that needs to be fixed soon, has many roots relation to that problem, and is probably a large reason as to why we only put up 7 on the Hawks.  

 

The thing is, though, reads and routes don't mean anything if the oline isn't what we need it to be.  I'm not sold on Silatolu or Scott, I'm still going to keep a wary eye on Kalil from the Lisfranc injury, and I worry heavily that Gross is done in the offseason.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's truly on the coaching, then as much as I want Ron to succeed here we need to miss the playoffs in order to bring in a stronger staff for Cam's sake.

That was but its on Cam for under throwing WRs and staying with a read too long. Hopefully it was just rust from both Shula and Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record I'm not saying the offense is going to improve, or get worse for that matter. I just find it absurd to judge the offense as a whole based on one game vs. a very good defense. Week 1 is always a weird week, you would think the people who cover sports for a paycheck would understand that.

 

I don't think our offense will be as productive as it was under Chud, stat wise, but it wouldn't surprise me to see us win more games with less mistakes under Shula. I thought he called a good game last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ehhhh, I'm not sure on that. Cam was quite accurate. I would like to see him spread the ball around more though.

Stats wise he was but if you watch the film you see him forcing passes and under throwing his WRs. Most of those drops by Olson were because the ball was low and behind him. The ball he threw to Smith that was almost intercepted was high and under thrown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...