Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers still 35% to make the playoffs


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

i just saw this...

 

 

Using their custom-built statistical model, Wharton professor Cade Massey and Las Vegas sports analyst Rufus Peabody run 10,000 full-season simulations each week to determine each NFL team’s projected win total, probability of making the playoffs and probability of winning the Super Bowl. The winner of each game is determined by Massey-Peabody power rankings (how a team would fair against average team on a neutral field), while also factoring in homefield advantage and chance. While the starting point for each team is their current Massey-Peabody rating (see Massey-Peabody.com for details), subsequent ratings change in response to simulation results.

.

.

.

In the NFC, the 2-3 Carolina Panthers made a huge jump from a 29.8% to a 48.9% chance of making the playoffs. In fact, the Panthers have a higher probability of winning the Super Bowl than the Chiefs and the 49ers.  With all their division games remaining, the underrated Panthers–ranked 4th in the Peabody-Massey ratings, behind the strength of the #2 defense in the league–have ample opportunity to make up ground.

 

http://blogs.wsj.com/dailyfix/2013/10/18/nfl-season-predictions-week-7/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't ever remember seeing so big of a disconnect between what statistical models are saying and the team's overall success (or lack thereof) to date.

 

Just about every in depth analysis says we should be a top 10 team, and I get a sense watching them that they could indeed be dangerous. Then we make one or two boneheaded plays, and things just snowball in a negative direction.

 

This is a very tough team to figure out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe we are magically two games behind New Orleans

 

i actually think we can catch up. their schedule thus far has been pretty easy and they've only won one out of two games against winning teams.

 

they've beaten the bucs, falcons, cards, dolphins, and bears.

 

coming up they've gotten the jets, cowboys, 49ers, and seahawks in addition to us twice, the bills, and the rams (although the rams shouldn't be a problem) plus they have the falcons in ATL coming up as well.

 

i can see them losing to the seahawks and jets (both away games) and losing to one of the 49ers or cowboys in new orleans and splitting with us.

 

the easiest part of their schedule is done. now the real teams come. they'll come back down to earth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i actually think we can catch up. their schedule thus far has been pretty easy and they've only won one out of two games against winning teams.

 

they've beaten the bucs, falcons, cards, dolphins, and bears.

 

coming up they've gotten the jets, cowboys, 49ers, and seahawks in addition to us twice, the bills, and the rams (although the rams shouldn't be a problem) plus they have the falcons in ATL coming up as well.

 

i can see them losing to the seahawks and jets (both away games) and losing to one of the 49ers or cowboys in new orleans and splitting with us.

 

the easiest part of their schedule is done. now the real teams come. they'll come back down to earth.

 

 

same could be said about our schedule

Link to comment
Share on other sites

same could be said about our schedule

 

almost, but we get the jets and pats here which helps and i think we can pull off beating the dolphins.

 

we also already lost to the seahawks so that's out of the way.

 

what we don't have out of the way is any division games yet.

 

it won't be easy, but i think it's definitely doable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...