Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Now That We Have Won, What Do The Defensive Replacements' Performance Today Say About Our Coaching Staff?


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

Look, if we string together some wins and put ourselves in playoff contention, ultimately it won't matter. But, I find it troubling that this rag-tag group of replacements were as dominant as they were today, and yet, it took injuries to completely wipe out our original starters and Rivera knowing he was a game away from being fired to make the changes.

Remember when I suggested that Rivera played favorites to our detriment and thst our organization has long had an issue with just handing out jobs rather than making players comoete and earn them? Many laughed it off.

I know that no one could've predicted THIS, but I think it shows what a problem we have had in personnel decisions under Rivera.

But again, I don't care about the past if he makes it right the rest of this season and learns from his mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A laughable notion. No offense will move the ball with the front four breathing down their neck the way ours did today. Hardy, Johnson, and Star wrecked any kind of offensive game plan they could have put together. Did the secondary have to make a big play at any point in this game? Not to my recollection.

 

We feasted on a weak offensive line performance. We rattled Manning in the first half and everything carried from there. Our offense woke up and we won the game.

 

We could have had four Sherrod Martin's in our secondary and nothing would have changed here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our defense didn't look like that in the first two weeks, in huge part due to the personnel.

The defense looked very good against Seattle.

 

They played their worst game in many weeks against Buffalo, but without the injuries, they would have pulled that game out.

 

The Giants today finished with 90 yards passing and 60 yards rushing.

 

This was the result of brilliant play by one of the very best front 7's in the league coupled with the one dimensional nature of the Giant offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our defense didn't look like that in the first two weeks, in huge part due to the personnel.

 

You literally cannot feel that to be true. I would question your sanity if you did. We had a two man defense with Hardy and Johnson. Pressure on the QB absolves all sins in this league. We collapsed the Giants line on every snap, rush or pass, and that was the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A laughable notion. No offense will move the ball with the front four breathing down their neck the way ours did today. Hardy, Johnson, and Star wrecked any kind of offensive game plan they could have put together. Did the secondary have to make a big play at any point in this game? Not to my recollection.

 

 

Last year against the Bears begs to differ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A laughable notion. No offense will move the ball with the front four breathing down their neck the way ours did today. Hardy, Johnson, and Star wrecked any kind of offensive game plan they could have put together. Did the secondary have to make a big play at any point in this game? Not to my recollection.

We feasted on a weak offensive line performance. We rattled Manning in the first half and everything carried from there. Our offense woke up and we won the game.

We could have had four Sherrod Martin's in our secondary and nothing would have changed here.

Yes because Godfrey, Beason, and Norman were completely flawless, unquestionable options at their positions.

The Giants put up huge numbers the first two games. Yes our DL was lights out, but they can't play that way if the back end isn't holding up. They are completely dependent on each other and our secondary got ate up for big yards the first two weeks. Changes shouldve been made earlier because our DL got pressure in the first two weeks and passes were still being completed to a far less talented receiving group by far less accomplished QBs compared to what the Giants have.

I think you are grossly underestimating the secondary's performance today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure how much he was a long term piece of this team.   Sucks to not have him as part of the rotation.   Looks like it's Lee Hunter time.     
    • This post was an error. Oops and sorry for the errors in the previous one. Too slow to edit.   We’ll see what they do.  
    • I am not sure he will put the over the games but we’ll probably have them.   Two things I am thinking.  We have 4 preseason games.  All the coaches have enough service time to know the standards that are in place for decades. If I recall it was play your starters just a series to start woth and build it up until week theee where play a lot and you have week four to set hour roster. Evaluate before cuts.   Bevell will certainly have the whole thing down pat.   I’d they don’t do the fries and frie air will worry too. Because it is set up to do that.     I have said since they went t three preseason people have to figure a new way are still feeling it out and trying things.  We don’t have to this year.  
×
×
  • Create New...