Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3 London games in 2014


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

I thought I remembered one there too.

 

The Cowboys were always popular south of the border. Give them one home game in Mexico City each year and they would probably fill up a 100,000 seat stadium easily.

 

They LOVE Joe Montana and the 49ers as well. If the 49ers and Cowboys played it would be bigger than the Virgin of Guadalupe Festival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

curious why it's always London myself as well...there's huge stadiums all over the damn place over there.

 

Amsterdam road trip anyway?!!!!!

Because they're testing the waters for putting a franchise there.

 

Even if other countries would support games, I don't see the NFL ever putting games there because few players are going to want to go live in non-english speaking countries.

 

London is really the only European city that works (although Amsterdam has a high percentage of English speakers as well).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Panthers in London would be real nice and i will gladly leave my hole to invade the Brits!

London is close enough from Paris, with the Eurostar i can travel from Paris to London (135 minutes), watch the game and move back to Paris the same day.

Belgianfan, you should be a litle closer & Osd22 may have to walk a litle more ^^

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coming over to watch a game September this year for my 30th birthday! I'd choose that over going to london because it's just not the same as stepping foot in BOA and mixing with the heart and soul of the carolina panthers, the fans!. It would be nice to have a game on my doorstep but i would rather watch the panthers on tv than go watch the cowgirls or jags on a Sunday just to say I've been to a football game, I love the nfl but my teams the panthers id feel a little disloyal watching another team hence saving money to come over and watch a few games later in the year which I'm going to make a regular thing (wel if I can convine my girlfriend into liking football)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've advocated this idea for years:

17 game schedule, one extra bye week. That way every team gets a neutral field game each year.

The nfl gets 16 games a year to put wherever they want, and nobody loses a home game. They could have 4 in London, 4 in LA, a couple in Mexico, one in Germany and Japan. Maybe a regular season game in Hawaii or Las Vegas, and wherever else they want to play a game.

Plus there would be 2 more weeks of nfl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers in London would be real nice and i will gladly leave my hole to invade the Brits!

London is close enough from Paris, with the Eurostar i can travel from Paris to London (135 minutes), watch the game and move back to Paris the same day.

Belgianfan, you should be a litle closer & Osd22 may have to walk a litle more ^^

 

10 min to Airport, 1 hr flight to LHR = Daytrip ;-) But only if the Panthers are playing. I am not going to watch any matchup not involving our cats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coming over to watch a game September this year for my 30th birthday! I'd choose that over going to london because it's just not the same as stepping foot in BOA and mixing with the heart and soul of the carolina panthers, the fans!. It would be nice to have a game on my doorstep but i would rather watch the panthers on tv than go watch the cowgirls or jags on a Sunday just to say I've been to a football game, I love the nfl but my teams the panthers id feel a little disloyal watching another team hence saving money to come over and watch a few games later in the year which I'm going to make a regular thing (wel if I can convine my girlfriend into liking football)

 

I do it every year, flying over from Germany to attend two games. It is just priceless. Do it and enjoy BOA!!! Also, I would never miss a Panthers game on TV or Gamepass for a Jags vs. whoever matchup. Never!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...