Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trail Blazers interested in trading for Gerald Wallace

CarolinaPanthers8789

Recommended Posts

CarolinaPanthers8789 Newbie

CarolinaPanthers8789

Posted
Posted

Source: Rotoworld per Charlotte Observer

The Trail Blazers have reportedly contacted the Bobcats about trading for Gerald Wallace, but Charlotte isn't likely to part with their star small forward.

Charlotte is trying to make the playoffs and drum up some interest in their flagging franchise, and the reaction of Bobcats beat writer Rick Bonnell is telling. "I'd be surprised," he writes, "if the Bobcats...would exchange Wallace for essentially cap relief and forward Nicolas Batum."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted

I think you are nuts thinking you can get LA or Roy-boy outta KP. A possible trade would be outlaw bayless mills for nazr and wallace. Roy Aldrige and batum. KP isn't letting go.

Batum was the original trade offer I believe. I'm saying is no to Batum, I want either Aldrige or Roy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted

Newest rumor out of Cleveland is Wally and JJ Hickson for Gerald Wallace....No....If that happens, Bobcats should and would lose many fans.

That is a definite no. They don't have anyone I'd like to have cept for James and that ant happening.

So if a deal goes down it better be something like Wallace and Nzar for Aldridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaPanthers8789 Newbie

CarolinaPanthers8789

Posted
  • Author
Posted

This shouldnt even be disscussed because MJ should have drafted Roy to begin with! That being said Mohammed and Wallace for Aldridge is a great deal. Maybe they could throw in Travis Outlaw or Martell Webster for some bench depth

Not a good deal at all because we are losing the only natural small forward we have. Now if they threw in Outlaw I would say go for it by Mohammed and Wallace for Aldridge and Outlaw would be a great deal. But Mohmmed and Wallace just for Aldridge is a bad deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Off Season Thread

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • PanthersNCSU
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • TD alt
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By TD alt · Posted

      Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...