Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greg Hardy. I Would Dominate Lebron James


chknwing

Recommended Posts

Oh you guys, I swear. That's some funny stuff. The guy is definitely playing with a few cards short of a deck.

Nothing wrong with saying what he said. It's called having a personality. Do you guys go to your jobs and beast out everyday? Do you set records?

Probably not but you should go into it with the attitude that you will set records and beast out everyday.

Any who, keep it up Greg the D is definitely ballon right now. Get dat swag right!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sarcastic, not sarcastic, I have no issue with the Lebron comments. It's irrelevant to me.

 

What is not irrelevant however is the potential investment we are possibly about to make into him. I want production on the field.

 

he has been producing even if it doesnt come up on the stat sheet.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to my post that this crappy iPad cut off......he had a nice offer on the table that he turned down(along with his hambone agent D.R) all predicated on his production this year.He is playing good but not dominate to command top DE money......32 million is a lot of jack.DG doesn't play games as we have all found out.He is not one to bend a whole lot when it comes to contracts and I doubt he will be pressured by anyone to give more then a player is worth. 32 big ones is a nice contract and would put Hardy in the company of some good DE as far as contracts go.He may just be walking (or traded) if he continues to be bullhead and refuses to sign.As I said before....never get to attached to individual players.All about the jack and loyalty is just a myth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he has been producing even if it doesnt come up on the stat sheet.

 

The very people here rushing to his aide would be the very ones who would be calling for his head if we give him a large contract, and he's still having low sack numbers and making outlandish predictions and claims. People may be eating it up right now, but things change.

 

That's the bottom line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The very people here rushing to his aide would be the very ones who would be calling for his head if we give him a large contract, and he's still having low sack numbers and making outlandish predictions and claims. People may be eating it up right now, but things change.

 

That's the bottom line.

 

the dudes joking around chill out. he's a character.

 

he's been coming up ready to play every sunday this season. He gives our d-line a personality and look we are a top 3 defense so far.   the rest of the stuff you just posted is irrelevant to this thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to my post that this crappy iPad cut off......he had a nice offer on the table that he turned down(along with his hambone agent D.R) all predicated on his production this year.He is playing good but not dominate to command top DE money......32 million is a lot of jack.DG doesn't play games as we have all found out.He is not one to bend a whole lot when it comes to contracts and I doubt he will be pressured by anyone to give more then a player is worth. 32 big ones is a nice contract and would put Hardy in the company of some good DE as far as contracts go.He may just be walking (or traded) if he continues to be bullhead and refuses to sign.As I said before....never get to attached to individual players.All about the jack and loyalty is just a myth.

 

The only originating source for this that I can seem to find is from Brett Jensen of WFNZ. Which basically means less than nothing.

 

Is there some other information that I'm missing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the dudes joking around chill out. he's a character.

 

he's been coming up ready to play every sunday this season. He gives our d-line a personality and look we are a top 3 defense so far.   the rest of the stuff you just posted is irrelevant to this thread

 

Depends on how much that "personality" is going to cost us if his sack numbers keep dwindling.

 

Again, I don't see the need to get so upset over a simple conversation, but whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on how much that "personality" is going to cost us if his sack numbers keep dwindling.

 

Again, I don't see the need to get so upset over a simple conversation, but whatever.

lol, no one is getting upset, tho some people are overreacting and reading too much into this little interview.

 

like this...

 

Hardy needs to get back to doing what he does best, not having silly interviews or making outrageous sack number predictions.

like he can't do both. one's not keeping him from the other. the two have nothing to do with each other. he's not taking that interview nearly as seriously as you think he is and if you think that he's not committed to being a great player (not that you are) then you're being ridiculous.

 

he's having fun in interviews and he's saying outlandish stuff because it's funny and entertaining..but when it's game time he's all business/beast mode. so what if he isn't leading the league in sacks or whatever. the guy is making an impact.

 

but hey, if you want to play grown up with hardy and think you know how he ought to act in interviews, go right ahead. i'll still think he's funny just as much as i think those saying "he needs to quit talking like that" are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shows how dumb this guy is.  He is apparently a better basketball player than Lebron but would rather play football for pennies than be worth 200 million+ playing basketball.

 

or how gullible you are at thinking he's doing anything more than just messing around.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol, no one is getting upset, tho some people are overreacting and reading too much into this little interview.

like this...

like he can't do both. one's not keeping him from the other. the two have nothing to do with each other. he's not taking that interview nearly as seriously as you think he is and if you think that he's not committed to being a great player (not that you are) then you're being ridiculous.

he's having fun in interviews and he's saying outlandish stuff because it's funny and entertaining..but when it's game time he's all business/beast mode. so what if he isn't leading the league in sacks or whatever. the guy is making an impact.

but hey, if you want to play grown up with hardy and think you know how he ought to act in interviews, go right ahead. i'll still think he's funny just as much as i think those saying "he needs to quit talking like that" are.

Again, I think you are taking my statements far too personally. I didn't say anything derogatory about him, or that he sucks.

Right or wrong, making the kinds of claims and predictions he has not only opens him to criticism, it practically invites it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, I think you are taking my statements far too personally. I didn't say anything derogatory about him, or that he sucks.

Right or wrong, making the kinds of claims and predictions he has not only opens him to criticism, it practically invites it.

 

taking them too personally? i don't give a flying fig newton what he does as long as he isn't breaking any laws and is playing hard when he's supposed to. i've just been laughing at people who are saying he shouldn't be saying stuff in interviews and taking his comments too seriously.

 

don't worry, i don't think you're any less of a fan for that. just funny is all.

 

and it only invites criticsm from the people who take that crap too seriously.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...