Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Ron Rivera be fired!


Pantherman

Recommended Posts

No thank you. But I just feel if Ron does go 9-7 and couldn't get into the playoffs because the other team had one more win then us. Doesn't mean he should fired. I would understand if the team went below .500 again. But I'm talking about a winning record. He should one more chance.  But McDermott as HC. No way in heck I would want him as HC. No way!

 

I assumed this is where you are coming from..  "one more chance" guys, gotta love 'em.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no playoffs no job!

so you want us to continue to suck?

RR is building a powerhouse D and Cam continues to improve.

Makes no sense if RR continues trending upward to fire him

And our D isn't just talent....it is great defensive coaching. That is RR

Why would we rebuild when our current rebuild would be trending exactly like it is suppose to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so you want us to continue to suck?

RR is building a powerhouse D and Cam continues to improve.

Makes no sense if RR continues trending upward to fire him

And our D isn't just talent....it is great defensive coaching. That is RR

Why would we rebuild when our current rebuild would be trending exactly like it is suppose to?

didn't say that... what I'm saying is he has no more room for failure and much to prove in the remainder of this season. 3 years can't come down to 3-3 against average teams minus the one (Seattle) being the only true contender thus far, in the his LAST year of contract. Yes our D is solid and the D-Cord as well but who can confirm those pieces won't remain with or without RR? I'm all for winning but what happens if we break even  or slightly over missing the playoffs again? 10-6 may keep his job or certainly any thing better but anything less is more of the same and that confirms necessary change somewhere in the front office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9-7 or better and we keep him. 

 

Sing some FA OL and draft OL and WR with our first 3 picks. 

 

Then see how things go next year. 

I'm not so sure 9-7 is good enough for any team now. The contenders are solid and make better runs. 10-6 might be the least wild card this year before its all over. Divisional wins are the key! we can't let Tampa run the table, nor Atlanta, and we need at least one from the Saints.

 

One a side note, the New England game we be or coming out party and can confirm us as who we think we are or will confirm us as who "they" say we are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

didn't say that... what I'm saying is he has no more room for failure and much to prove in the remainder of this season. 3 years can't come down to 3-3 against average teams minus the one (Seattle) being the only true contender thus far, in the his LAST year of contract. Yes our D is solid and the D-Cord as well but who can confirm those pieces won't remain with or without RR? I'm all for winning but what happens if we break even  or slightly over missing the playoffs again? 10-6 may keep his job or certainly any thing better but anything less is more of the same and that confirms necessary change somewhere in the front office.

you said he should be fired at 9-7 or 10-6 if we miss playoffs.....if we do that would be pointless.  

 

Rebuilding when a rebuild was working?  That keeps you sucking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure 9-7 is good enough for any team now. The contenders are solid and make better runs. 10-6 might be the least wild card this year before its all over. Divisional wins are the key! we can't let Tampa run the table, nor Atlanta, and we need at least one from the Saints.

 

One a side note, the New England game we be or coming out party and can confirm us as who we think we are or will confirm us as who "they" say we are. 

we have been better than 9-7 how many times?

 

I think SF is more telling.  NE has Brady smoke and mirroring his way to wins.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we have been better than 9-7 how many times?

 

I think SF is more telling.  NE has Brady smoke and mirroring his way to wins.   

i forgot about SF.... for some reason I think we have a good chance at shocking them. the only fear is they are coming off of a bye. Kap is a fraud in a 2nd year slump.... oh but that only applies to cam. so they won't say that this year... smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you said he should be fired at 9-7 or 10-6 if we miss playoffs.....if we do that would be pointless.  

 

Rebuilding when a rebuild was working?  That keeps you sucking

10-6 should be a playoff spot. if not, he may get the Lovie Smith exit. He just better win these divisionals (4-2) would be ideal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...