Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why is Turner being run into the ground such a hot topic


Recommended Posts

and AP running into the ground is not? AP already has injury problems and had 13 less carries and 15 more receptions than Turner last year.

I think its b/c all the fantasy pubs are ranking him #2 and he's coming off a record number of carries in one season. Since he classically was a backup to LT people are wondering how he'll hold up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is Turner being run into the ground such a hot topic?

Honestly, it's a legitimate possibility.

When Jerome Bettis was the Steelers main workhorse, he always wore down by season's end. Likewise, the Dolphins ran Ricky Williams into the ground. And yes, the Vikings might do that with Peterson.

It happens, and Turner fits the profile. Whether or not it happens to him depends a lot on the Falcons coaching staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't worry about it. Their coaching staff is probably already mindful of the possiblity of overworking him, and will just give Matt Ryan even more freedom, along with getting Norwood more carries. Plus, even if he does show signs of wear, the Falcons can always spend a 3rd or 4th rounder on a decent RB in next year's draft.

I'd just be concerned if the rookies on defense can adjust and play well quickly, and if the team can translate last year's success to this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...