Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I did my own lil research


beastson

Recommended Posts

Under Rivera/Cam era, the Panthers are 13-1 when scoring 30pts & over with that 1 loss to Detroit in 2011

 

 

2012 & 2013 ONLY

 

24pts & UP, the Panthers are 11-1 in 2012 & 2013. That 1 Loss IN ATL last season

 

In games scored 21pts BEFORE the 4th quarter in 2012, they're 6-1 ^ Look one sentence up. In 2013, they're 4-0 = 10-1.

 

21pts period or LESS than 21pts, 2012 & 2013 they're a combined 1-9

 

You ask 24 and 21. what about 22 and 23. Well the Panthers in 2012 and 2013 are 0-2 scoring 22 in Chicago in 2012 and 23 to Buffalo in 2013

 

When you combine all that and find a median. The Panthers are 11-1 24pts and above, 1-11 24pts and below in 2012 & 2013. Creepy it's the exact opposite isn't it

 

It shows to me in defensive battled games, it decreases our chance of winning. But if Cam and offense being as good as they can do, we're very hard to defeat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Under Rivera/Cam era, the Panthers are 13-1 when scoring 30pts & over with that 1 loss to Detroit in 2011

 

 

2012 & 2013 ONLY

 

24pts & UP, the Panthers are 11-1 in 2012 & 2013. That 1 Loss IN ATL last season

 

In games scored 21pts BEFORE the 4th quarter in 2012, they're 6-1 ^ Look one sentence up. In 2013, they're 4-0 = 10-1.

 

21pts period or LESS than 21pts, 2012 & 2013 they're a combined 1-9

 

You ask 24 and 21. what about 22 and 23. Well the Panthers in 2012 and 2013 are 0-2 scoring 22 in Chicago in 2012 and 23 to Buffalo in 2013

 

When you combine all that and find a median. The Panthers are 11-1 24pts and above, 1-11 24pts and below in 2012 & 2013. Creepy it's the exact opposite isn't it

 

It shows to me in defensive battled games, it decreases our chance of winning. But if Cam and offense being as good as they can do, we're very hard to defeat

 

Good stuff but I'm willing to bet that there are plenty of teams that have similar stats. Correlation and causation and stuff. 

 

Do you win because you score points or do you score points because you win?

 

My go to stat is how we do against tough defenses and tough front fours...and surprise we are crushing the weak ones and struggling against the tough ones.

 

We face two tough ones over the next 12 days. Get back to me then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Under Rivera/Cam era, the Panthers are 13-1 when scoring 30pts & over with that 1 loss to Detroit in 2011

 

 

2012 & 2013 ONLY

 

24pts & UP, the Panthers are 11-1 in 2012 & 2013. That 1 Loss IN ATL last season

 

In games scored 21pts BEFORE the 4th quarter in 2012, they're 6-1 ^ Look one sentence up. In 2013, they're 4-0 = 10-1.

 

21pts period or LESS than 21pts, 2012 & 2013 they're a combined 1-9

 

You ask 24 and 21. what about 22 and 23. Well the Panthers in 2012 and 2013 are 0-2 scoring 22 in Chicago in 2012 and 23 to Buffalo in 2013

 

When you combine all that and find a median. The Panthers are 11-1 24pts and above, 1-11 24pts and below in 2012 & 2013. Creepy it's the exact opposite isn't it

 

It shows to me in defensive battled games, it decreases our chance of winning. But if Cam and offense being as good as they can do, we're very hard to defeat

Excellent analysis! Don't let these fools discourage you from doing things like this in the future either. Those are all interesting facts that I didn't know. I will have this in mind during every single game now. Very cool, your research has made a difference in this fans perspective and knowledge base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Bucs waived shilo sanders after he got ejected. 
    • I'm just tired of ppl saying he's so accurate and then have to see recievers slow down to recieve the ball, ruining any chance at YAC
    • Some people will really look at stuff like this and say "no more excuses" but then make excuses to try and explain away the validity of big-time throws. 🙃   Back on topic though, as I mentioned in the other AT thread earlier, I hope that the team is still exploring the deal. If the Vikings want the Panthers to take on some of the salary, then it had better be at worst a 4th-round pick (though I imagine Dan angling for a 3rd). If they're willing to take on all of it, then maybe at worst a 5th. Tough pill to swallow, giving up a 4th for a 35yr old WR, but if MIN believes they can have similar success behind McCarthy then it could be a smart deal for them. Hell, if AT has any gas in the tank and gives them a 1yr sweetheart deal to close out at home, even better for Minnesota. Yea, Bryce loses his best and most reliable WR. Hunter Renfrow though isn't what I would call a huge step down though (if he's as advertised throughout camp), and it gives more reps to TMac + XL + Coker. This season is all about continued development and answering some of the looming questions (Is Bryce the guy? Is Evero the DC going fwd? How do the young WRs develop? How long does it take this defense to bounce back from being historically awful?).
×
×
  • Create New...