Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DRAFT SPECULATION/NEWS THREAD


MichaelNewtonII

Recommended Posts

Just randomly browsing through, but lol at the dude saying he was invited to PJ's draft party. He put up a promotional flyer on his Instagram for everyone to come to Inferno in Greensboro to celebrate with him.

 

Also called himself a "Hometown Hero". Stay modest, PJ. 

 

He is a hometown hero. What are you saying?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you must know my girlfriend came home and told me we were invited to such events. Had no idea about anything around. Stay classy

Hey it's all good, have fun.

I just don't think it's necessary to go around gloating about who you know. My friends dad owns the hotel that the opposing teams stay at when they come to Charlotte to play the Hornets and I have tons of pics with players but I don't feel the need to brag about it because they are just people... Sure it's cool to meet them, but at the end of the day they are the same as me and you just richer and better at basketball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey it's all good, have fun.

I just don't think it's necessary to go around gloating about who you know. My friends dad owns the hotel that the opposing teams stay at when they come to Charlotte to play the Hornets and I have tons of pics with players but I don't feel the need to brag about it because they are just people... Sure it's cool to meet them, but at the end of the day they are the same as me and you just richer and better at basketball.

 

the ritz? Why don't you post pictures I actually like to see those type of things guess I'm a different person then. Apologies to all of you once again. Be back tomorrow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's almost as bad as McDermott.

No doubt, I think Randle will be a much better NBA player, at the very least, a solid 10-10 guy. But, what would drafting him say about Cody?

I just don't get it.

All these guys are gambles, if you're gonna gamble, at least gamble on your proven worst position and bring in a potential replacement with the pick... Shooting guard has been established as our weakest link long ago, and it needs to be addressed. Unless we're talking all-time great-type of talent at #9, why would you draft for the same position within a year or two after you just addressed it with a top 5 pick?

It's idiotic.

No it's not idiotic! Randle could be the best player in this draft when you look back at it 5 years later. He's an upgrade to Zeller.

We need to get better. Let's quit drafting based on needs. That's why we've been so bad in the draft.

SG could be fixed through FA. We have 20mil on cap space!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey it's all good, have fun.

I just don't think it's necessary to go around gloating about who you know. My friends dad owns the hotel that the opposing teams stay at when they come to Charlotte to play the Hornets and I have tons of pics with players but I don't feel the need to brag about it because they are just people... Sure it's cool to meet them, but at the end of the day they are the same as me and you just richer and better at basketball.

Why take pictures with random people?

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you have versatile players who can play multiple positions, you dont have to rigidly stick to drafting positions you are weak at.  Passing on a talent like Randle b/c we have Zeller would be silly.  The draft is a crapshoot, take the best player then balance your roster with trades if you have to, because 4 years from now who knows what the roster looks like.

 

I dont see anyone in Indy complaining about drafting Paul George even though their best player at the time played the same position and was still in his mid-20s.  A few years and a couple injuries later and Danny Granger isnt even close to the same player he was

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...