Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Snapchat turns down $3B offer fron FBook


Kitten Diver

Recommended Posts

Exactly.  My concept is not having to work ever again, swimming in 100 dollar bills, getting a fruit punch fountain in your room like Mr. Deeds, seeing any sporting event you want, etc.

 

Greed may turn out bad for this guy.  We'll see though.  I mean how much isn't enough?

 

Maybe the owner just has a terrible panel of financial advisors. I mean, Yahoo bought tumblr (a blogging social media site for you old farts) for 1.1bil. As for the demographic thing, I'm not sure if that's necessarily true. Let's remember that Facebook users outnumber those on Snapchat, and I would be willing to bet that most teens/tweens would get a Facebook first. Snapchat has a few interesting features, but it essentially is MMS, picture messaging, just in a more accessible platform. I would be interested to read Facebook's reasoning for this, as it almost makes essentially no sense to invest 3bil in a fad-driven social media app. 

 

Edit: Twitter sold for 10B. That, I get. Marketing opportunities are endless on twitter, but Snapchat? I barely see how it is "social media" enough to generate THAT much revenue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Facebook will be in the drawer with free 1000 hour AOL CDs, diskettes, and hypercolor shirts in 10 years.

 

i remember people seven years or so ago predicting it'd be completely gone in half a decade.

 

people have griped whenever facebook changes, but its adaptive nature is what's kept it relevant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...