Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Grantland: Rivera Made Best Coaching Moves of the Week


fieryprophet

Recommended Posts

And if we would have lost, he would look like he doesn't know what he is doing. I hate these kind of arguments. We had to go for it on 4th and 10 at our own 20. Not saying Ron is a bad coach, but you would like to not have to be in that position. He still has a lot of making up to do in my book. Again, not trying to bash on Rivera, just trying to respond to the thread topic. I just hate how analysts contrive these argument post hoc.

If I may interject perhaps it's like when you know you have the hottest dual threat qb in the league on a 4th and 10 down by 3 and there's not much time left it's a good call to go for it, but when you call timeouts with the clock running down to 0 to close out the half so that the other team can get their field goal unit out and comfortably strut to the field and not have to rush it's a bad call?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the biggest changes during our winning streak has been our halftime adjustments.   Last year and earlier this year, it seemed like we always got out-coached and out-adjusted coming out of the locker room for the 2cd half.  During our winning streak, we have consistently been a better 2cd half team than our opponents.  Props to Rivera and company. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if we would have lost, he would look like he doesn't know what he is doing.  I hate these kind of arguments.  We had to go for it on 4th and 10 at our own 20.  Not saying Ron is a bad coach, but you would like to not have to be in that position.  He still has a lot of making up to do in my book.  Again, not trying to bash on Rivera, just trying to respond to the thread topic.  I just hate how analysts contrive these argument post hoc.

 

Actually even if we would have lost, it still would have been the correct call. Look at the time differential between him calling them when he did vs. if he had waited. The argument is based on facts/statistics - not post hoc observations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if we lose?

 

I bracketed my comment with a "I'm not bashing the decision" disclaimer, yet you still take offense to it.  And just because "all sports commentary is post-hoc," [and accepting that as true] that doesn't make it correct; 2 + 2 still equals 4 no matter what the masses say.  You can still report post-game without crafting your opinion on the outcome, and I believe you are confusing the two.

 

 

Zod please ban "IF" just like curse words

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...