Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would like some advice on physics books

OneBadCat

By OneBadCat,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

OneBadCat Grand Master

OneBadCat

Posted
Posted

So one of my favorite hobbies to talk about space and reality with my friends. Alternate universes, why things are the way they are etc. I love to watch documentaries on space and of course Through the Worm Hole with Morgan Freeman(God). I've read Carl Sagan's Cosmo's and books like Physics of the Impossible by Michio Kaku.

 

Anyway I find this stuff interesting. More so than the average bear I think. But I would honestly like to learn more about space and physics in general. I took physics in high school and I only went up to Statistics in College. So I am by no means a wiz kid. But I would like to read something that explains  the laws of physics. Something that  reads like a book but also breaks down formulas and explains processes.

 

I figure there had to be some space lovers out there or perhaps some physics majors that could put me in the right direction.  Any suggestions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Salvo Newbie

Salvo

Posted
Posted

Actually, the "For Dummies" books might be something to look into. I used them to refresh for my Calculus classes since they go into the basics and provide mathematical formulas and examples when necessary. Only good for the shear basics, though. If you get past all that and want to dive into relativity or quantum mechanics, you'll probably want a college textbook. Which you can find for dirt cheap if you pick out the older editions. Hell, I got a few lying around from a couple years ago that I don't use anymore, and wouldn't mind parting with for the cost of shipping. But probably easier just to go to a local used bookstore, especially if you live close to a campus.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mother Grabber Grand Master

Mother Grabber

Posted
Posted

anything that is in your standard higher ed level course will be available online for free, and probably written better.  A typical 1st year undergrad class will spend the first half of the year on classical mechanics, and then the second semester on modern physics.  It's a good idea to get a grasp of mechanics basics before diving into modern concepts, even at the entry level.  Classical mechanics is the foundation upon which all other classes are based.

 

Second semester modern physics will introduce you to Einstein's theory of relativity, quantum mechanics and get into the physics of the really, really small and the really, really big.

 

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_physics

 

Follow this standard, and you will have a good baseline understanding to help you dive into specialized topics.  You can learn all of the intro level stuff online, and then you will have a better idea of what you are actually looking or in terms of further theoretical topics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mother Grabber Grand Master

Mother Grabber

Posted
Posted

just to elaborate a little more...I got my BS in physics, and we spent the entire course of study on foundational stuff on a laundry list of topics, and lots of math that didn't have any numbers in it.  Without getting into boring details, the point is to get your base line, then you can direct yourself more effectively.  Following a higher ed curriculum past the first year will spread you out for a long time on a very broad spectrum...which is kind of the whole idea behind undergrad school in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dos poptarts Newbie

dos poptarts

Posted
Posted

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Brief_History_of_Time

 

Good but I don't think it gets into formulas.

 

hahah....I think Hawking specifically mentions that he will only use 1 formula because for each equation you lose half of your audience according to his publisher.

 

Honestly when I tried reading it, I only made it to chapter 8 I think before 'the Hawk' lost me. I still have it on my book shelf....may pull it back out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By strato · Posted

      Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • fieryprophet
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By fieryprophet · Posted

      No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • strato
      Bryce's Achilles Heel Is Not What You Think It Is

      By strato · Posted

      Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...