Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's talk about Ginn


TCF2

Recommended Posts

#1 I think the guy is clearly sand bagging on kick/punt returns. I've suspected this for a couple of weeks and feel like I've seen enough to make the accusation.

#2 if you're gonna sand bag on returns then make an impact as a WR... In the 2nd qtr today... In my opinion he sandbagged on a punt. The entire left side of the field was open for 6... The very next play he was thrown a screen, where if he bounces it outside it's an easy TD. Instead he goes inside and doesn't follow his blocks.

And Thank God for SuperMan on 4th down!!!! River Boat!!!!!!

Anyways, anybody else notice these Ginn things ive mentioned?

Discuss (I'm not even bringing up the 3 drops on bombs that would have been 6)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sand bagging... Not trying hard.

I have a theory that he's not giving it his all because he doesn't want to get injured while returning a punt or kick.

I believe that he wants to remain healthy because he wants to continue to increase his snaps as a WR

Anybody agree/disagree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why the fug would Ginn do that?

 

I don't think he made the wrong cut on his screen.  

 

His punt return did confuse me, but based on what he's done in the past I suspect he had a reason for why he went straight up instead of trying to bounce it outside.  It's easy to say the left side was wide open but I don't know if it would have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OP is accusing Ginn of intentionally not playing hard and intentionally making poor decisions.

Because what we had before him returning punts was even better. Also what player would do that on a contract year, after being on three different teams in his career, where one team didn't even trust him at WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...