Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Every quality team has had at least 1 horribly embarrassing game this season. Don't let this one get to you.

Pox 08

By Pox 08,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Pox 08 Newbie

Pox 08

Posted
Posted

Title says it all.     We're still a high quality team.   We're still playoff contenders.   

 

 

Don't let this loss  upset you.    We will bounce back,  like the other quality teams have bounced back from being embarrassed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pox 08 Newbie

Pox 08

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I don't consider the Seahawks or Bills as embarrassing losses.

 

 

Cards and Saints..  Yes.

 

 

Colts have had,  3?     Broncos have had 2.   Saints had the Seahawks last week.   Pats had the bengals.    Chiefs had the broncos x2 and the Chargers.     The 9ers had the Seahawks,  and the Panthers.....  that 1 point lead may as well been a 100 point lead,  we all knew Kaep wasn't going to do anything.

 

 

Every quality team this year has had an embarrassing loss.    We will bounce back and we will be stronger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pox 08 Newbie

Pox 08

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I agree then.  If we lose to the Jets at home next week.  Then may be the time to start worrying.   Not this game though against the Saints.    Most of us had high hopes,  but there was that feeling that we'd split with them. 

 

 

 

It also wouldn't surprise me if SS89 or one of the other receivers mentions through the week that the Saints DBs were holding them,  cheap shotting them on every play..       We saw what was happening to our front four out there.                   Home teams sometimes get the favorable calls or non-calls.    That's the game.                          I would complain about it,  but, I honestly believe we'll get some favorable calls or non-calls against the Saints at BOA in 2 weeks.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...