Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers v. Saints matchup #2


jamos14

Recommended Posts

I saw two interesting stats from PFF on the Rams-Saints game yesterday.

 

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2013/12/16/pff-reaction-blog-week-15/

 

 

 

- The Rams offensive line allowed pressure on only 4 passing attempts as they were required to pass protect on only 20 occasions.

 

   Easier said than done obviously but this has/is our method to winning.  Keep Cam upright and run the ball successfully.

 

- All bar 22 of Zac Stacy’s 133 yards came outside the tackles. This 17% of yards between the tackles is unusual for him as he normally averages 50%.

 

  This may be off base but I seem to remember us trying to run a lot on the Saint's interior last game.  They have some BIG bodies on their front and seem to clog up the middle efficiently.  I am optimistic based on D-Wills game this week that we can have some serious success on tosses, sweeps, power, etc.  He looked good turning the corner and our WRs had a nice blocking game sealing the edge. 

 

Let's discuss what adjustments we expect to see this week.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saints off had almost 400 yards and 6 redzone trips while Saints Def held a Rams to 3 points and 67 yards in second half, the 17-0 lead because of turnovers minutes into game is what lost game. Add to that a surprise onside to get another possession and a sack fumble and 4 turnovers to Zero as well as two blocked FGs were the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saints off had almost 400 yards and 6 redzone trips while Saints Def held a Rams to 3 points and 67 yards in second half, the 17-0 lead because of turnovers is what lost game. Add to that a surprise onside to get another possession and a sack fumble and 4 turnovers to Zero as well as two blocked FGs were the difference.

The 400 yards is bullshit, garbage time stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saints off had almost 400 yards and 6 redzone trips while Saints Def held a Rams to 3 points and 67 yards in second half, the 17-0 lead because of turnovers minutes into game is what lost game. Add to that a surprise onside to get another possession and a sack fumble and 4 turnovers to Zero as well as two blocked FGs were the difference.

 

I get what you're trying to say here but you can't discredit every thing the Rams did right and belittle all the mistakes the Saints made.

 

Of course 4 turnovers is going to be a huge difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saints off had almost 400 yards and 6 redzone trips while Saints Def held a Rams to 3 points and 67 yards in second half, the 17-0 lead because of turnovers minutes into game is what lost game. Add to that a surprise onside to get another possession and a sack fumble and 4 turnovers to Zero as well as two blocked FGs were the difference.

 

Catfish's Logic....Hey guys, we got ran out of the dome.....but let me give you some worthles and meaningless stats that said we really won the battle.

 

Dude....you are PATHETIC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is Saints defensive study from Panthers game that explains what worked,

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcsouth/post/_/id/53076/film-study-reviewing-saints-defense-8

Solo stops: I can't remember the last time I noticed so many impressive solo tackles by the Saints defense. The best was safety Malcolm Jenkins' hit against Newton on a read-option run that knocked him for a 2-yard loss inside the Saints' red zone. Fullback Mike Tolbert was heading out to block Jenkins, but Jenkins made him whiff when he knifed inside. Then Jenkins hit Newton around his knees to flip him up off the ground. That play ultimately led to Carolina settling for another field goal on its second possession.

Cornerback Keenan Lewis also made a terrific tackle against receiver Steve Smith for a 3-yard loss on a receiver screen in the second quarter. Lewis fought off a block attempt by receiver Brandon LaFell and practically shoved LaFell into Smith while making the tackle.

Safety Kenny Vaccaro made two nice open-field tackles. Linebackers Curtis Lofton, David Hawthorne and Parys Haralson each made standout solo stops, as well.

Disciplined effort: Last week, the Saints' defense probably had more undisciplined breakdowns at Seattle than they had in the first 11 games combined -- in both pass coverage and run containment. This week was like night and day in both areas.

Galette -- who got burned by a couple run plays at Seattle -- did a very impressive job of staying home on the edge of the line during the Panthers' read-option plays. One time he snuffed out a short pass intended for DeAngelo Williams. Another time, he was so busy spying on Williams that he let Newton scramble for a 6-yard gain -- but it was still evident that he was doing his job.

Other times, the Saints clearly had a spy hovering back behind the line of scrimmage to keep Newton from running free (Lofton at least once and Hawthorne at least twice). Newton still managed to beat a couple blitzes with long scrambles (finishing with six runs for 48 yards). And Carolina's trio of running backs gained 80 yards on 17 carries. But the Saints were solid enough in that area -- much better than some previous nightmares against the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saints off had almost 400 yards and 6 redzone trips while Saints Def held a Rams to 3 points and 67 yards in second half, the 17-0 lead because of turnovers minutes into game is what lost game. Add to that a surprise onside to get another possession and a sack fumble and 4 turnovers to Zero as well as two blocked FGs were the difference.

So what you're saying is, the team that played the better overall game won? Wow. Here I was thinking that a point fairy just gave the Rams all those points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get what you're trying to say here but you can't discredit every thing the Rams did right and belittle all the mistakes the Saints made.

Of course 4 turnovers is going to be a huge difference.

Wasn't trying to say the Saints won with stats, I was just pointing out that it wasn't just the running of Stacy that made the biggest impact, I was pressure that led to turnovers, there were many places to blame, but the pressure forced 3 turnovers and two blocked kicks which I can't remember the last time we had a kick blocked, much less 2 in a row. Turnovers made the difference, Saints were still able to move the ball to redzone on most drives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is Saints defensive study from Panthers game that explains what worked,

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcsouth/post/_/id/53076/film-study-reviewing-saints-defense-8

 

 

 

Can't argue at all with that.  The Jenkins tackle on that play was huge, same as the Lewis tackles on the WR screens.

 

Carolina needs to have better success against Gallette pass blocking this game too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to turn this into a thread attacking Alice or poo talking. Let's talk about the game alone. (we have enough of those threads already).

Exactly, That's what I was trying to do, but apparently pointing out anything specific about game to address what worked and what didn't is the same a me saying Saints won or should have won. Smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saints off had almost 400 yards and 6 redzone trips while Saints Def held a Rams to 3 points and 67 yards in second half, the 17-0 lead because of turnovers minutes into game is what lost game. Add to that a surprise onside to get another possession and a sack fumble and 4 turnovers to Zero as well as two blocked FGs were the difference.

 

Ahhh the old "change 6 or 7 plays and we would have won" argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...