Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Civil Lawsuit Filed Against Ben Roethlisberger


Skew

Recommended Posts

From that pic it's obvious she's a psycho money grubbin' woman of ill repute.

I concur she looks hideous!!!!!!!

And Kobe got the attention he did bc the media forcefed us that he was the poster child for black america to look up to and aspire to be like only to find out he is an adulterous prick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN has a DO NOT REPORT on the story according to PFT.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/07/21/source-espn-issues-do-not-report-alert-on-roethlisberger-story/

Then there's this:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/07/21/is-espn-trying-to-preserve-its-relationship-with-roethlisberger/

Very interesting.

Wouldn't be surprised if it DOES have something to do with their wanting to maintain access to him and make their show look good.

After all I wondered how in the world Marcellus Wiley could be such a devout critic of Favre for ages then all of a sudden, he's on the Favre slurpmobile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is amazing that ESPN wouldn't report this. They report rumor and innuendo all the time. Makes you wonder if it were a Black player would they still be biting their tongue?

Ben is one of the golden children, you don't mess with Ben, that would almost as bad as messing with Brady...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

espn sucks ass.and once again it all boils down too what color you are....lets say vince young did this i bet espn would have stop showing bullshit sportscenter and begin talking about this story.its sad really, but like i said in another post.racism built this country and it will never go away.lets see how much gets swept under the carpet lmbao!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently the reason why ESPN isn't reporting it is because it's not considered a criminal case yet.

However, an ESPN source tells Deadspin that it's a previously established company policy to not report on civil cases involving athletes. Presumably this means that were it tied to a criminal case (like the Zendejas situation) or there were other extenuating circumstances, it might become "news," but they would otherwise stay out of it.

http://deadspin.com/5319432/espn-ignoring-biggest-stories-of-the-day-important-updates

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At that point, he allowed her to get off the bed. McNulty claims that she went to the bathroom, and "tried to pull herself together." When she emerged, she claims that Roethlisberger asked, "There are cameras on this room, aren't there?"

She responded by saying, "Yes, there are cameras everywhere."

Then there ought to be plenty of evidence to prove it..

and just because it's detailed doesn't mean much to me... When I was 15, I could give a very detailed response and have people believe it... Not saying she is lying, but I've been hearing on the radio and on here that because it's detailed, there must be something to the story.. And maybe there is, but let's see evidence..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
    • It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
×
×
  • Create New...