Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Packers or 49ers, who do you want to see next Sunday?


Kevin Greene

  

175 members have voted

  1. 1. Packers or 49ers, who ya want at BofA?

    • Packers
      145
    • 49ers
      30


Recommended Posts

Would be sweet to eliminate our old NFC West foes.

Eh I was 10 the last time we played in conference so I'm not big on the old rivalry but I do believe we match up better against the 49ers offense. If we hold Gore to 50-65 yards then we should win that match up. Aaron Rodgers can take over a game if he has time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh I was 10 the last time we played in conference so I'm not big on the old rivalry but I do believe we match up better against the 49ers offense. If we hold Gore to 50-65 yards then we should win that match up. Aaron Rodgers can take over a game if he has time.

 

I do believe Rodgers and his WR corp presents the biggest match up problem to our weak backside of the D.

But their D offsets that imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Packers. We can move the ball against them, and put pressure on Rodgers.

 

I worry about San Francisco. Yes, we beat them earlier in the year, but they played that game without Crabtree and, for the most part, without Vernon Davis. That's not a chance I'd like to take again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
×
×
  • Create New...