Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Norv Turner Leaves?


beastson

Recommended Posts

I would like to see a shake up. I'm not satisfied with what we are getting from Cam. He is capable of doing more if we put him in the right situation.

 

But Norv is a bum. He's been coaching off reputation for 20 years. The Charges went downhill when Schottenheimer left. Washington Redskins? Cleveland Browns? Come on man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. Shula will probably be back next season.

Fans always hate their OCs. We hated Henning, then Davidson, then Chud, now Shula. If we hired Norv we would hate him too.

I liked Henning and Chud except his last year he was all about himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Henning was good, I liked him. Davidson is kind of like Shula. How could you watch us go 0 for 3 in the Redzone and say Shula is safe?

 

We scored TDs on 58% of our red zone visits this season.  That is good for top 10 in the league

 

9 of 16 games were against top half of the NFL defenses.

 

So one game doesn't make me want to fire everyone.  If you look at the entire body of work this season we were pretty successful on offense.

 

That is unless you judge everything by total yardage and/or total points.

 

We can still improve however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see a shake up. I'm not satisfied with what we are getting from Cam. He is capable of doing more if we put him in the right situation.

 

But Norv is a bum. He's been coaching off reputation for 20 years. The Charges went downhill when Schottenheimer left. Washington Redskins? Cleveland Browns? Come on man.

 

Norv is a bum HC, nowhere near a bum OC. x10 Shula will ever be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see much difference between Chud and Norv Turner.  They usually have lots of yards, but his teams also is near the bottom in INTs and turnovers.  It is all very much high risk, high reward

 

There is a reason why Chud and Norv teams always have a lot of yards, but not a lot of wins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd been trying out different mobile browsers to see what worked best with the board (Brave used to be good but wasn't cutting it these days). My Choice: Firefox (Android) Unlike some others, Firefox embeds links on the first try. The method that works best is to make the change from "x" to "Twitter" in a separate editor (note taking apps tend to work) then paste it in as plain text. Doing this, I've yet to have an issue. Also worth noting that this browser doesn't give you the little "broken link" sign when you post an emoji like a lot of others do. Hope that helps 🙂 ... Of course if you can't spell or type for sh-t, you're lazy about editing and/or your grammar sucks, a browser isn't going to help that 😐
    • Sacks are a function of the scheme you run and the quality of your pass defense. Many sacks are coverage sacks because your secondary stopped the short pass and gave your rushers time to get to the quarterback. One gap schemes generate more sacks from your d- line while 2 gap schemes tend to concentrate sacks on linebackers and blitzers. So how successful any of our D line will be will depend on Evero's scheme. If we rush three again and no blitzes we won't be getting sacks.  If we use more press coverage and start 6 guys on the line and confuse the blocking assignments and use more blitzes, stunts and overloads Brown and company could feast. Guys will get more work as they learn the system and playing time as they produce on the field.
×
×
  • Create New...