Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vegas lays odds on Panthers winning it all next year


Captain Morgan

Recommended Posts

Seattle Seahawks — 9/2
San Francisco 49ers – 15/2
Denver Broncos – 8/1
New England Patriots – 14/1
Green Bay Packers – 16/1
New Orleans Saints – 18/1
Atlanta Falcons – 25/1
Carolina Panthers – 25/1
Chicago Bears – 25/1
Cincinnati Bengals – 25/1
Philadelphia Eagles – 25/1
Indianapolis Colts – 28/1
Kansas City Chiefs – 28/1
Arizona Cardinals – 33/1
Dallas Cowboys – 33/1
Detroit Lions – 33/1
New York Giants – 33/1
Pittsburgh Steelers – 33/1
San Diego Chargers – 33/1
Baltimore Ravens – 40/1
Houston Texans – 40/1
St. Louis Rams – 40/1
Washington Redskins – 40/1
Miami Dolphins – 50/1
New York Jets – 50/1
Tampa Bay Buccaneers – 50/1
Tennessee Titans – 50/1
Cleveland Browns – 66/1
Buffalo Bills – 75/1
Minnesota Vikings – 75/1
Oakland Raiders – 75/1
Jacksonville Jaguars – 100/1

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://nfl.si.com/2014/02/03/super-bowl-xlix-odds-seattle-seahawks/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can they do this poo when FA and the draft have yet to happen?

 How teams draft and any trades or free agent pick ups will change many teams odds from what it is now.

 

As an example, when the Jets drafted Geno Smith to be their starter, they went from the middle of the pack to the bottom as far as odds go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ They also lose the GOAT TE. Odds are to entice casual bettors, and we are a small market team, pure and simple. We also have the GOAT QB entering year 4, the DPOY, and the Coach of the Year, regardless of the draft or FA. I like our chances as good as any.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait...Atlanta has the same odds as us when their season went so bad but we went 12-4?

 

Odds are, we have more injuries, and they have less next season.

 

We were lucky this year with the injury bug, and some late game weirdness.

 

And let's be honest here, our offense can't score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Odds are, we have more injuries, and they have less next season.

 

We were lucky this year with the injury bug, and some late game weirdness.

 

And let's be honest here, our offense can't score.

 

They certainly had a high profile injury, we did not and were fortunate.  But although the guard position is not high profile, it is still important and injuries to that position killed us in the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They certainly had a high profile injury, we did not and were fortunate.  But although the guard position is not high profile, it is still important and injuries to that position killed us in the playoffs. 

 

I'm just saying the odds of us finishing next year without an injury to a player at a marquee position is very slim, and that's part of the reason we are tied with ATL.

 

OC hurt us more than OG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...