Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Largest solar power plant in world goes online...


Darth Biscuit

Recommended Posts

I've been trying to sell solar engineers and contractors on our industry for about 5 years now. There are millions of square feet of unused warehouse rooftops that could be used to house solar panels. So far the ROI still seems to be too long to justify some of the projects I've been researching unless the facility owner is some gung-ho environmentalist. Some of the bigger property management firms are finally utilizing their rooftops as solar fields in some areas. In some cases the facility can be taken almost entirely off the grid, in others they are simply selling the power generated back to the local energy co-op. But ROI is still around 15-20 years I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been trying to sell solar engineers and contractors on our industry for about 5 years now. There are millions of square feet of unused warehouse rooftops that could be used to house solar panels. So far the ROI still seems to be too long to justify some of the projects I've been researching unless the facility owner is some gung-ho environmentalist. Some of the bigger property management firms are finally utilizing their rooftops as solar fields in some areas. In some cases the facility can be taken almost entirely off the grid, in others they are simply selling the power generated back to the local energy co-op. But ROI is still around 15-20 years I believe.

They need to figure out a way to make the return a bit more immediate. Maybe incentive the workers that if they chip in they get x tax credit along with the company. You get real time return but the long term is easier funding the sinking costs.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been trying to sell solar engineers and contractors on our industry for about 5 years now. There are millions of square feet of unused warehouse rooftops that could be used to house solar panels. So far the ROI still seems to be too long to justify some of the projects I've been researching unless the facility owner is some gung-ho environmentalist. Some of the bigger property management firms are finally utilizing their rooftops as solar fields in some areas. In some cases the facility can be taken almost entirely off the grid, in others they are simply selling the power generated back to the local energy co-op. But ROI is still around 15-20 years I believe.

At the commercial or utility level, ROI is easily achievable in less than 10 years, especially in NC. When I worked for a solar company in Maryland, our commercial clients usually had ROI's of 5-8 years...and solar costs have dropped nearly 60% since I worked in that industry just 3 years ago. Incentives in most areas have also decreased, so the ROI for the system owners have remained similar. Homeowners will always have longer ROI's because of economies of scale.

 

The plant like the one pictures above cannot be compared to a regular solar system though. I don't really know much about their ROI's, but the technology is way different.

 

That entire array simply concentrates the sun's rays to boil water, producing steam, which creates electricity. Molten salts are used to store the sun's heat so the system can continue producing power at night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need to figure out a way to make the return a bit more immediate. Maybe incentive the workers that if they chip in they get x tax credit along with the company. You get real time return but the long term is easier funding the sinking costs.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

There are lot's of funding sources out there now that will allow businesses to be net income positive from day 1.

 

Solar farms / systems are relatively attractive to long term investors that are looking for a consistent and predictable investment. We have decades of data that give us a reliable average for number of sunny days and you can easily calculate the system's production from that data. Some assumptions are made on the price of electricity, but whether you take best case (electricity prices stay where they are) or worst case (they increase significantly) the returns are still relatively attractive for someone that wants a "safe" investment.

 

Investing in solar technologies is decidedly less safe, but the systems in operation are pretty safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are lot's of funding sources out there now that will allow businesses to be net income positive from day 1.

 

Solar farms / systems are relatively attractive to long term investors that are looking for a consistent and predictable investment. We have decades of data that give us a reliable average for number of sunny days and you can easily calculate the system's production from that data. Some assumptions are made on the price of electricity, but whether you take best case (electricity prices stay where they are) or worst case (they increase significantly) the returns are still relatively attractive for someone that wants a "safe" investment.

 

Investing in solar technologies is decidedly less safe, but the systems in operation are pretty safe.

 

Totally agree.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Great point.    I would lke to add that there is another QB on the roster who was terrible over the middle--Kenny Pickett.  
    • I don't think this is the year for Carolina, unfortunately.  I think they will have to make a decision on the QB position-all we know is that Bryce has year 5, but a long term deal has not been signed--yet--and they would be smart to take a "wait and see" approach.  I have not kept up, and I see a path to upside for Bryce, but I do not think we have aggressively pursued a QB when our QB was mediocre to worse than mediocre.  yes, his numbers are improving--but he has adapted by eliminating what he does poorly and not improving on what he does poorly.  Just my take and I have no data to support this view.   Basically, we go as Bryce goes, so the approach is not to bring in a QB to have him compete until we find one, but it is to make Bryce as good as he can be--is that good enough? Season ticket holders buy the hope of winning rings, not winning 8 games. Last year, Bryce had a resurgence.  Take away TMac and Rico Dowdle.  How good was he?  I still have hope.  Not a hater of plan A, but a hater because we have no plan B.
    • Yeah man, I've been here for a very very long time. Couldn't even begin to tell you what year. Maybe 2004 or 5? I've never really been super active, just enjoy reading everyone's opinions and discussions. I'll chime in from time to time. I have had a few different accounts over the years. It's always been a fun place for me to check in on my favorite team. Hopefully we can keep the place running for a long while still. I also would like to recommend bringing back the Lovely Ladies page!
×
×
  • Create New...