Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Colts continue good moves: Sign D'Qwell Jackson


top dawg

Recommended Posts

And lots of money to spend. There should be no excuses next year. Turning the ball over 7 times in 2 games and being the underdog again at 11 wins is unacceptable. The Texans are coming.

 

agreed

 

hope the jags get Bridgewater

 

you just know the excuses will come for Luck if they dont live up to expectations... the NFL got Chud away from Cam after he was setting records his first 2 years..... they wanted Chud with Luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And lots of money to spend. There should be no excuses next year. Turning the ball over 7 times in 2 games and being the underdog again at 11 wins is unacceptable. The Texans are coming.

 

agreed

 

hope the jags get Bridgewater

 

you just know the excuses will come for Luck if they dont live up to expectations... the NFL got Chud away from Cam after he was setting records his first 2 years..... they wanted Chud with Luck

 

Just when I think you guys can't possibly get any dumber... :unsure:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You try so hard not be that to the point that you try too hard. It's suppose to be natural.

 

I don't have to "try" to be anything, kid.  I'm a little old for pretense, and frankly never cared much for it anyway.

 

Now, if I were, say, someone who constantly made posts and threads disparaging and talking down players of a certain race (with the content of said posts generally being extremely stupid and showing a complete lack of football knowledge), well then it might take some major effort to try to convince people that i wasn't bigoted.

 

Happily, that's not something I do.

 

You, on the other hand...well :unsure:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm the type of fan that doesn't care about the color of a player's skin.

 

Your posts say otherwise.

 

The fact that you make it a purpose not to 'care about the color of a player's skin' show that it's something you're forced into. Whether you like it or not. What other choices do you have when majority of the players in the league are African American. You'd be one stressed dude if your favorite pass time is football and you care about the color of the players' skin. There are a large population who fit that category. The fact that you keep volunteering to state your stance shows that something bothers you or at least you aware that it should at least bother you or others. Tolerance is a practice, it's not something one is aware of 24/7. You come across 'I have a ---- friend' guy. I'm not calling you a bigot but you make it a purpose not to be one. That in itself can be stressful too.

 

 

I don't have to "try" to be anything, kid.  I'm a little old for pretense, and frankly never cared much for it anyway.

 

Now, if I were, say, someone who constantly made posts and threads disparaging and talking down players of a certain race (with the content of said posts generally being extremely stupid and showing a complete lack of football knowledge), well then it might take some major effort to try to convince people that i wasn't bigoted.

 

Happily, that's not something I do.

 

You, on the other hand...well :unsure:

 

For the sake of this discussion I will go outta my element and stating that one of my favorite players on this team is Greg Olsen. My image of him is a guy who make all the tough and crucial catches for us to move the chain. If it weren't for the sake of this discussion I would be doing him a disservice to write on a message board that he's white player. Just a dude that work his ass off catching passes between LBs and DBs.

 

As for Luck and Manziel, they don't play for this team and the media sell them as super athletic players with no basis for it. If Manziel and Luck had ran a 4.35 or even a 4.45 I would then understand. Manziel was projected to run in the 4.4 range and then he ran TE speed at 4.68, instead of the hype diminishing they spin it again into a positive for him. Ideally his stock should have plummeted never to be heard of again until his name is called in the 4th round, just like turtle Michael Sam who ran a 4.91 and could barely stay attentive at interviews. This is the combine process I'm used to. Weed out the worst from the best.  

 

Bortles is a projected top 5 player as well, but right now this is probably the first time I've typed his name on this message board. That's because the media covers him according to what his talent warrants just like the other projected 1st rounders. Nothing more, nothing else. But, as for those other idiots, you can't open a sports page without seeing a story about either of them.

 

And finally, I do believe a dual threat(def. player who run fast and make accurate passes. Ideally 4.5 speed) QB is more valuable and difficult to scheme against. I prefer them for my team. Totally bigot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that you make it a purpose not to 'care about the color of a player's skin' show that it's something you're forced into. Whether you like it or not. What other choices do you have when majority of the players in the league are African American. You'd be one stressed dude if your favorite pass time is football and you can about the color of the players' skin. There are a large population who fit that category. The fact that you keep volunteering to state your stance shows that something bothers you or at least you aware that it should at least bother you or others. Tolerance is a practice, it's not something one is aware of 24/7. You come across 'I have a ---- friend' guy. I'm not calling you a bigot but you make it a purpose not to be one. That in itself can be stressful too.

For the sake of this discussion I will go outta my element and stating that one of my favorite players on this team is Greg Olsen. My image of him is a guy who make all the tough and crucial catches for us to move the chain. If it weren't for the sake of this discussion I would be doing him a disservice to write on a message board that he's white player. Just a dude that work his ass off catching passes between LBs and DBs.

As for Luck and Manziel, they don't play for this team and the media sell them as super athletic players with no basis for it. If Manziel and Luck had ran a 4.35 or even a 4.45 I would then understand. Manziel was projected to run in the 4.4 range and then he ran TE speed at 4.68, instead of the hype diminishing they spin it again into a positive for him. Ideally his stock should have plummeted never to be heard of again until his name is called in the 4th round, just like turtle Michael Sam who ran a 4.91 and could barely stay attentive at interviews. This is the combine process I'm used to. Weed out the worst from the best.

Bortles is a projected top 5 player as well, but right now this is probably the first time I've typed his name on this message board. That's because the media covers him according to what his talent warrants just like the other projected 1st rounders. Nothing more, nothing else. But, as for those other idiots, you can't open a sports page without seeing a story about either of them.

And finally, I do believe a dual threat(def. player who run fast and make accurate passes. Ideally 4.5 speed) QB is more valuable and difficult to scheme against. I prefer them for my team. Totally bigot.

Step One: Talk about someone else hypothetically using the 'black friend' argument.

Step Two: State "one of my favorite players is white".

Step Three: Talk (yet again) about the white quarterbacks you've repeatedly posted hatred for.

Wow. You're not exactly Captain of the Debate Team are you, kid? :lol:

And all that after using the first response in a thread about D'Qwell Jackson to talk not about him, but about the object of your delusional obsession, Andrew Luck.

You really do need help, kid. See a counselor about that obsessive disorder you have. Maybe they can help you get rid of some of that hate you're carrying around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...