Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Google Earth and Military security?


TANTRIC-NINJA

Recommended Posts

No article here but I remember having a conversation with a co worker who was an officer at FT Bragg.

I know we have a lot of soliders and Huddlers who serve in the Military.

Anyone who lives next to a military base knows that road maps usually have the base itself blanked out only showing the outer borders of the property save for major roadways.

He was a guy who knew where the Delta Force facility was at in Fayettenam but it is never put on a map for obvious reasons.

While he was on Google Earth he just did a couple of Spit takes bc there it was...accessible to anyone.

So my question is do you think there is a reasonable amount of Censorship that should exist in programs such as Google Earth?

Or it the ability to find something like that that was once supposed to be a classified operation part of our freedom and informational rights?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe its located near Range 3. It's been published for years I read that in a book in high school in the 90's. What could anyone do with that information? Break into the center holding some of the best and most dangerous men and women (Yes, Delta has a platoon of women) in the Army?

 

We all know that satellite imagery of lets say the air defenses on top of the White House have always been blurred.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to use Google earth with MGRS to do map recons and look for possible medevac areas... had the grid coordinates already planned out.

The installation I was at in Germany was always blocked out. But I could head over to youtube and there would be videos that were basically a tour through that very installation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No article here but I remember having a conversation with a co worker who was an officer at FT Bragg.

I know we have a lot of soliders and Huddlers who serve in the Military.

Anyone who lives next to a military base knows that road maps usually have the base itself blanked out only showing the outer borders of the property save for major roadways.

He was a guy who knew where the Delta Force facility was at in Fayettenam but it is never put on a map for obvious reasons.

While he was on Google Earth he just did a couple of Spit takes bc there it was...accessible to anyone.

So my question is do you think there is a reasonable amount of Censorship that should exist in programs such as Google Earth?

Or it the ability to find something like that that was once supposed to be a classified operation part of our freedom and informational rights?

 

When I first used Google Earth, the first place I checked (after my house) was the " Harvey Point CIA base" in NC. You could zoom in all around it, but the base and nearby areas were still low res shots. If Osama could have used Google Earth he might have seen his own compound layout according to some reports I've read.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you can see it from a plane, I think you ought to be able to see it on google maps.

 

I would hope that the military would be smart enough not to put anything terribly secret where it's visible from a plane.

 

IE "alienz were here" on an area 51 hangar roof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you can see it from a plane, I think you ought to be able to see it on google maps.

I would hope that the military would be smart enough not to put anything terribly secret where it's visible from a plane.

IE "alienz were here" on an area 51 hangar roof.

The CIA facility has a 25 mile "no fly zone" radius. I bet the other bases do as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Former league executive and current NFL.com analyst Marc Ross recently named his top second-year breakout candidates for the upcoming campaign. Ross includes Legette, who may be helped out by his team's latest first-round selection. He writes: Legette had a slow start to his NFL career, catching 49 passes for 497 yards and four touchdowns last season. Some of the struggles can be tied to his own growing pains -- he had eight drops on 81 targets, according to Pro Football Focus -- but he had also had to navigate the quarterback shuffle between Bryce Young and Andy Dalton early in Dave Canales' first season leading the Panthers. Canales recently said he believes Carolina has a DK Metcalf-like talent in Legette, who had foot surgery this offseason but was cleared to resume work in early April, and that having a full offseason alongside Young, who took a significant step forward in 2024, could lead to a breakout result in 2025. I anticipate it will also help that Carolina invested another first-round pick in a wide receiver, Arizona's Tetairoa McMillan, to complement Legette in the pass game. McMillan's presence, however, could take some pressure off Legette—who may be able to roam around in a more natural playmaking role. With the 6-foot-4 All-American likely to take on the bulk of the volume from Young, Legette should have some cleaner shots to break out downfield and in the box score.     https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2025/05/06/panthers-wr-xaiver-legette-top-breakout-candidates-2025/83475176007/?taid=681a4610ede05d000149b376&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=trueanthem&utm_source=twitter
    • my understanding is a big time throw, could be a 5-10 yard slant to Adam Thielen given AT isn't going to separate.   
    • It's a subjective stat that PFF made up. https://www.pff.com/news/pro-pff-qb-grading-most-effective-tool-there-is  
×
×
  • Create New...