Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What shotgun should I buy?


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

Any recommendation? I was thinking Remington 870 Express. I almost bought it last weekend but decided to consult huddle first.

 

Excellent choice. 12 or 20 ga?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I almost bought this one...

 

http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/cPath/37_64_991/products_id/95077

 

But then I saw more tactical one and I'm not sure if it worth paying $100 more...

 

http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/cPath/37_64_991/products_id/56472

 

I can probably buy these accessories myself on amazon for cheaper

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great rating too.  I might pay more just so I can buy American... but then again.  I don't know if they make Remington in the USA.

 

From what I can tell, the 870 is still made in the US. Worth a call to Buds though.  I almost bought the H&R last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well what are you going to use it for?

Bird hunting/shooting - That Remington is a damned fine shotgun.

Home Defense and general badassery - Mossburg 500 12ga w/ 20inch barrel and pistol grip

Home defense/shooting ranges/hunting/zombies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dark Knight

H&R is the exact same thing as the Remington.

Don't waste your money on the expensive "tactical" versions. The H&R is a solid gun. If you just want a US made gun or the big name, get a plain Remington 870 or Mossberg 500.

It's just a shotgun. Point, pull the trigger, blow poo up. You don't need an adjustable AK style stock, pistol grip, optical sight, breech tip, heat shield, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mossberg 500 is very versatile.  you don't have to break the bank to get the base model, then over time, you can upgrade.  i saw lots of these in the military and they're very reliable.  just my opinion.  good luck with your search.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...