Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hybrid Wildcat?


Jakob

Recommended Posts

Hybrid Wildcat? Well how would that work? Well as you all know we have a big tall quarterback that can run like the wind, by the name of Cam Newton. Imagine if we had another big tall quarterback that could run even faster AND catch the ball? We do, his name is Joe Webb. 

 

 

Imagine the look on the face of the opposing defense if we came out with a two QB wildcat package. Hate it or love it I think it would be hilarious. Put Tolbert out there too and you wouldn't know what's about to happen.

 

the possibilities are endless!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a terrible idea.

 

edit: To expand, we saw last year that the wildcat for us was a mediocre running play at best, esp. in the 2nd half of the season.  While Webb may find his way onto the field, I am never in favor of taking the ball completely out of Cam's hands and using him as a distraction. He is our biggest playmaker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, It's really a mystery as to why we signed Webb, it would have made sense if we had of let Anderson walk. if we needed a QB for OTA's we could of just signed a practice squad scrub.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Shula.

That's whole pie worthy bruh.

I don't see us keeping 3 QBs, but I love that he's so versatile. Just can't see them dressing 3 QBs on game day, but of course he could dress as a WR and be the emergency QB.

At the same time, we had a hybrid before (Armanti Edwards) with a much more creative o-coordinator by the name of Chudzinski, and he was never used at all.

As Mr Red said, two words, one name

Mike Shula

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, It's really a mystery as to why we signed Webb, it would have made sense if we had of let Anderson walk. if we needed a QB for OTA's we could of just signed a practice squad scrub.

You need some one with real talent not just a scrub to take some of the reps Cam will miss.

Plus we need to find a backup QB for the future bc we are bound and determine to get Cam hurt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...