Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2014 Masters


Darth Biscuit

Recommended Posts

It's that time golf fiends...  my favorite golf week of the year.

 

Sadly I haven't been since 2008, so if one of you would kindly acquire me some badges I will send you some boob pics or something...

 

 

 

Tiger is out, Phil is playing like poo... who you got?

 

 

Rory?

mcilroy-rory-050213-640x360.jpg

 

 

Kuch?

122839536.jpg.

 

DJ?

dustin-johnson.jpg

 

 

or Paulina?

 

Paulina-Gretzky-on-cover-of-Golf-Digest-

 

 

 

 

I'm curious as to how the course will look minus the Eisenhower Tree and with whatever other damage they got in the ice storm...

 

 

history_background_01.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My foursome includes a couple longshots who've been playing well:

 

Jason Day

Matt Kuchar

Ryan Moore (9/10 cuts made, $2M in earnings with 4 Top 10 finishes, avg 4.2 birdies per round)

Kevin Stadler (10/11 cuts made, $1.6M in earnings with 2 Top 10 finishes, avg 4.2 birdies per round)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THE MASTERS
AUGUSTA NATIONAL GOLF CLUB - AUGUSTA, GEORGIA
APRIL 10-13, 2014
 
ODDS TO WIN:
RORY McILROY                 10/1
ADAM SCOTT                   10/1
PHIL MICKELSON               12/1
JASON DAY                    12/1
MATT KUCHAR                  12/1
DUSTIN JOHNSON               20/1
BUBBA WATSON                 20/1
JUSTIN ROSE                  25/1
BRANDT SNEDEKER              25/1
ZACH JOHNSON                 25/1
HENRIK STENSON               25/1
SERGIO GARCIA                25/1
JASON DUFNER                 30/1
KEEGAN BRADLEY               30/1
JORDAN SPIETH                30/1
LEE WESTWOOD                 40/1
CHARL SCHWARTZEL             40/1
ANGEL CABRERA                40/1
HARRIS ENGLISH               40/1
HUNTER MAHAN                 40/1
LUKE DONALD                  50/1
GRAEME McDOWELL              50/1
GRAHAM DeLAET                50/1
IAN POULTER                  50/1
JIMMY WALKER                 50/1
RICKIE FOWLER                50/1
LOUIS OOSTHUIZEN             60/1
GARY WOODLAND                60/1
RYAN MOORE                   60/1
STEVE STRICKER               80/1
WEBB SIMPSON                 80/1
BILL HAAS                    80/1
JIM FURYK                    80/1
HIDEKI MATSUYAMA             80/1
K.J. CHOI                   100/1
FRED COUPLES                100/1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Sans the Eisenhower Tree

 

Makes that drive look completely different, eh?

 

 

I just don't see Phil doing it this year... he's too inconsistent (again).

 

Man I would LOVE to see Couples up there competing again... he's done well the last few years but his back just can't hold up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...