ECHornet

Similar to our failures at QB in the Rhule era, I'm glad our front office wasn't afraid to scrap it all when they saw our lack of proficiency on offense. At least we have hope now.

I'm with you on the edit. I don't think that would be intriguing enough for a "game of the week," but it would be a juicy match up for both fan bases and will add talking points.

Yea, the NFL does this whether we think they need eyeballs Week 1 or not. Last year, Week 1 included these match ups: Baker vs. Browns Wilson vs. Seahawks If the Packers and Jets were set to play in 2023, I guarantee that would be a Week 1 game.

I've made this point before in favor of Shenault at RB. Below is the ranking of "yards after catch per reception" leaders in 2022. You'll notice most of the top 20 are RBs, and the first true WR (Deebo plays everywhere) was Rondale Moore at #24. Shenault had 12.2 YAC/R last year which would put him first above all the elite RBs you see listed. I'm not sure why he isn't listed as he had 27 receptions last year, and Henry (33) and Etienne (35) only had a few more. At a minimum, I believe this suggests Shenault could be a proficient 3rd down back.

The NFL tries to create matchups week 1 that best incorporate drama from last year or the offseason. What other match up would be better? Some have mentioned the Texans which I can see. That's pretty much it.

That's why I feel the Colts are the safe bet for Week 1. If Young and/or Richardson aren't named Week 1 starters, the NFL still has the Colts vs. Reich storyline.

Irsay is involved: https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/36322587/colts-say-qb-anthony-richardson-improve-playing "I know that's one of the primary reasons why you start [him] opening game is because it gets better by playing," Irsay said. "That's the biggest benefit from it. And at the same time, I have to say, the fans have to have patience. Because it's hard. We'll see what happens, and he can surprise a lot of people. "But it is tough. It's tough, but it's the way to go."

I think the Colts are a likely option. Reich vs. the team that fired him Young vs. Richardson

This. Probably 1/3 or more of the TEs drafted this year are older than Tremble.

Meh. We received a 5th for Arnold which was fair imo. Giving the Jags a 3rd for a young and cheap CB isn’t the end of the world and I still view it as worth the risk.

How can you not be excited about a draft where we picked our franchise QB at 1.1? Then a guy who’s been compared to one of the league’s best WRs. Throw in OL depth with starter potential and likely backups at OLB and S.

No he’s not.

He’s significantly bigger than those OSU WRs. He reportedly ran a 4.46 in high school and I’m sure he isn’t slower now. I also think he draws the most attention from opposing defenses compared to the others, and he still dominates.

He’s the best WR prospect since Chase and a future All-Pro.

A lot of guys I thought would be drafted that will be available. Let's hope our two round head start on the end of draft process helps.

Here's my hopefuls for UDFAs: Keaton Mitchell, RB Sean Tucker, RB Bryce Ford-Wheaton, WR Joseph Ngata, WR Jaxson Kirkland, OT Emil Ekiyor, IOL Andre Carter, DE Ivan Pace, LB Isaiah Moore, LB Eli Ricks, CB and Bumper Pool, if only for the name.

DJ Johnson walks right in above YGM on the depth chart? I doubt it.

Branch and Porter are worth it at 39. If they’re gone then I agree we should avoid DBs at 39. I’d be happy with Branch Porter Jr Mayer Ojulari First IOL off the board

I’ve seen multiple analysts say Maye might have been the #1 pick in this draft, if eligible. 5th best? nah

Not even the top QB in his draft class.

I think Fitt crushed it signing FA WRs this offseason with who was available.

I think both are capable of being top 10 QBs in the NFL. I chose Drake, but I'd be extremely happy with either one.

But then Levis still wouldn’t go 1 which is reflected by the shifting odds.

This is fun