Jump to content

Jaxel

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    3,470
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jaxel

  1. To be fair, this is clearly in jest, I'm not advocating that we sign him.
  2. But the idea of him playing twice against the falcons intrigues no one? I think it would be hilarious.
  3. What are the repercussions for the Colts if they cut Matt Ryan, and if they did, would you sign him to finish out the year? This will not happen, but fun scenario to walk through.
  4. I'm all about it, I hope Wilks turns this ship around. We can still get a QB in the draft regardless.
  5. PJ has always had great mechanics, he just routinely made dumb plays under pressures and went for the most difficult throws, he says he has learned that not the way to go. Great chance in of hime, we will see if he can keep it up.
  6. We gotta lose enough to get him, but we about to go on that 4 game win streak lol.
  7. Definitely agree on not taking him Top 10, this is in reference to if we finish somewhere in the 12-20 range. Possibly through a trade back or something.
  8. No man, he plays is one of the most awful systems devoid of talent you could almost ever watch play, and some how still puts out okay numbers. Make no mistake Stanford is an awful program with no talent right now. That guy can make all the throws, great arm, good mobility. His adjuster accuracy rate is way above the numbers. You need to watch him play to understand. https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/Player/Tanner-McKee-QB-Stanford
  9. Tanner McKee come on down lmao.
  10. To be fair, they put on a clinic on what not to do in the last 5 minutes of that game. Some of the most boneheaded coaching I've seen.
  11. That's his goal, tank but look competitive.
  12. Not true, they legit such as person and newton said multiple times it owuld be tough to get a 1 for CMC.
  13. Multiple Panthers reporters confirmed this Adam's report though.
  14. Your not taking a 2024 and 2025 first from the Rams, for instance - first of all the value of a 2024 first is not equal to that of a 2023 first, and they are essentially late round picks. I think I saw someone posted comparable trades and the players Jacksonville and the Jets got and it was bad. So For example, I think Fiterrer would think a lot harder if it was say, the eagles pick in the top 10 right now and next years first than 2 late round firsts.
  15. Agree, this is why I don't take Bryce Young number 1 either. Part of number one is measurables and potential. QB's can learn and grow the mind with study and experience, but you can't grow 5 inches. It has to be part of the evaluation.
  16. You don't have to tank when your starting QBs are PJ Walker and Jacob Eason... I don't understand how folks to don't get this.. the season was lost the minute we fired Rhule at 1-4.
  17. It's ridiculous to pass on a potential franchise QB because of a third round rookie who looked like they didn't belong in even the pre-season last year.
  18. I love Bryces game, but with the number one pick I think you have to factor in measurables and potential growth. Stroud and Levis have those... So I think Stroud is the one.
  19. I see we got the ongoing, never ending wait till next year crowd going. If you keep waiting for next year, you will always miss. Pick a QB this year and roll... This is the way.
  20. What? Tom Brady played for Michigan. Literally none of these apply to him.
  21. I wouldnt trade DJ or Burns unless it's an astronomical haul. Shaq yes, Donte yes, but the rest of the young core, no thanks.
×
×
  • Create New...