Jump to content

jb2288

HUDDLER
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,029

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by jb2288

  1. jb2288
    Who would be out? Or would we carry 6
  2. jb2288
    Don’t think Welker was on that team and Brady still was very average back then. He had like 200 total yards that game.
  3. jb2288
    soft
  4. jb2288
    With the new rules you’re just shooting your self in the foot for no reason if you dont carry a third. No reason not to
  5. jb2288
    It was the same. Nobody thought his body could stand up to the SEC and the the small cali kid with all the talent wouldn’t last a year.
  6. jb2288
    I’m not getting involved in this argument but thought it was funny you called one of the most subjective things one can imagine, objective
  7. jb2288
    Thanks! Will check that out
  8. jb2288
    Gotcha thanks. Is there somewhere we can request to buy tickets if someone selling those days? Don’t wanna clutter up the main forum haha
  9. jb2288
    Mods please remove if not allowed. Looking to take my dad/mom/grandfather to the Texans game Oct 29th. Found a few decent tickets on vivid seats and Ticketmaster but they want over $60 on fees per ticket.... was just curious if we have a ticket exchange community on here?
  10. jb2288
    eh there is absolutely zero way to know that. We'll never know
  11. jb2288
    For the player: skip off season crap for the team: longer on the market usually the easier to negotiate/sign them
  12. jb2288
    we counting sacks? I was and expecting a higher number of sacks as he translates to NFL speed
  13. jb2288
    more passing yards WAY less rushing. maybe 4100 pass, 35 yards rush
  14. jb2288
    You can keep saying the same thing over and over again as much as you want. Yes you would need to replace Burns with a rookie DE or go buy one in FA. Yes you would have an extra first round pick (or 2 if you go FA). These are not new revelations.
  15. jb2288
    Really moving the goal posts there bud lol
  16. jb2288
    Did you just state the most obvious thing ever back at me and then go on a victory rant? Yes, of course we would’ve used one on a DE. That isn’t a breakthrough you just made man
  17. jb2288
    Yes and we should have (and would have) taken them if one was a 2023
  18. jb2288
    In what world is the #12 pick (higher than Burns was drafted just saying) and a probable top 5 pick in 2024 jags? Now THATS a bad take
  19. jb2288
    He did play TE at Oregon in 2021
  20. jb2288
    I was just about to say this. What if we didn’t draft him as a DE…..
  21. jb2288
    Trading up isn’t free lol. What they gave up to take a DE was stupid (and I think CJ will be a bust but that’s subjective)
  22. jb2288
    WE ARE ON THE CLOCK
  23. jb2288
    Wow another te before Washington
  24. jb2288
    Dude there’s no way. They’ve probably had the worst draft after Lions
  25. jb2288
    I don’t either. Really weird pick for them and overall terrible draft.
×
×
  • Create New...