SOJA

I suspect he signs with KC, TB, Pitt or longshot New England

be fine with this

Chiefs traded up for Mahomes, funny how that isn't on the list

^^^^^^^^^^^

You literally stole the tweet word for word

lmao

I'd be happy with Slater or Sewell at 8. It would fortify a position of desperate need. However, there is probably going to be a pretty good LT sitting at 40 this year, deep position

I'm 100% in on us trading Little to Washington. Hurney is the only one who believes in him

we have a definite competitive advantage this draft, I wouldn't mind us trading down from 40 to pick up an extra 3rd rounder this year

At least we no longer Marty Hurney who would still be banging the table for xfl guys

There is a world where I would be happy taking 3 NDST players 8- Trey Lance 40- Dillon Radunz 72- Jabril Cox LB

yea Lance at 8 is basically my number two most desired scenario behind trading for Watson

Miami and Cincy are our most likely trade partners. We trade with Miami if either Fields or Wilson falls to 3 and we felt strongly they were QB#2 We trade to 5 if we like all the top 4 equally and are ok getting whoever is there. Atlanta is a real key because I truly don't think they are going to take a QB, I see them taking Slater or Sewell. Miami really doesn't want to pick at 3 and will want to trade down but if someone doesn't blow them away with an offer they might get stuck taking Devonta at 3. Cincy makes a ton of sense to trade with because they will get their guy Sewell or Slater at 8 in all likelihood

Chiefs make a lot of sense

oh you were OP, yea he wasn't fired for that man

again this has nothing to do with them losing the last game which is what the OP tried to claim he was fired for.

Still am not seeing how wilson "screams" Mitch lol

been here since 09 sheesh

great post OP only thing I would disagree on is the mitch comp. Mitch never wowed me, some of Wilson's throws wow me I love the Lance bit, I think he has the highest ceiling out of anyone not named Lawrence

this is awesome news

Posted this in another thread We are probably going to have to trade up to GUARANTEE a QB is the pick now, however with the Stafford trade I think it is more likely Lance falls to 8. Who do I think we might trade with? The Bengals at 5 are VERY interesting. Per this draft chart: https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp The capital to move up from 8 to 5 isn't that bad. It would take basically 8th overall, a third and fourth rounder. Let's say the Panthers bet on being better next year, so we trade: 8th, third this year, and a future fourth for 5. Here's why this is interesting. Let's assume no one bites on the Jets mega offer and they take Wilson at 2. The Dolphins again will want a king's ransom. Again if no one bites they're forced to take the guy they want (Devonta) at 3. Falcons are interesting because I really have no idea what they do but it is conceivable they DONT go QB because Matt Ryan's deal is an absolute albatross and the worst I've ever seen. Suddenly, the fifth pick has Fields and Lance (pick your player). Panthers give the Bengals a chance to still get Sewell/Slater at 8 more than the Colts or 9ers would be able to provide. Also you can bet your bottom dollar Fitts is trading back in the second round in this scenario above to reaquire some of the capital it took to move up to 5. Let's say with the WFT who is going to be itching to take their "Greg Little, Everrette Brown" first rounder who is in the second all of a sudden.

same. I'd rather trade up to 3 for Wilson OR trade up to 5 for either Lance or Fields

It's weird how all of this is leaking lol

I posted this in another thread: We are probably going to have to trade up to GUARANTEE a QB is the pick now, however with the Stafford trade I think it is more likely Lance falls to 8. Who do I think we might trade with? The Bengals at 5 are VERY interesting. Per this draft chart: https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp The capital to move up from 8 to 5 isn't that bad. It would take basically 8th overall, a third and fourth rounder. Let's say the Panthers bet on being better next year, so we trade: 8th, third this year, and a future fourth for 5. Here's why this is interesting. Let's assume no one bites on the Jets mega offer and they take Wilson at 2. The Dolphins again will want a king's ransom. Again if no one bites they're forced to take the guy they want (Devonta) at 3. Falcons are interesting because I really have no idea what they do but it is conceivable they DONT go QB because Matt Ryan's deal is an absolute albatross and the worst I've ever seen. Suddenly, the fifth pick has Fields and Lance (pick your player). Panthers give the Bengals a chance to still get Sewell/Slater at 8 more than the Colts or 9ers would be able to provide. Also you can bet your bottom dollar Fitts is trading back in the second round in this scenario above to reaquire some of the capital it took to move up to 5. Let's say with the WFT who is going to be itching to take their "Greg Little, Everrette Brown" first rounder who is in the second all of a sudden.

Radunz in the second might be a way to fix LT