Jump to content

LinvilleGorge

Moderators
  • Posts

    83,538
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LinvilleGorge

  1. I'm sure we're doing our due diligence everywhere.
  2. I don't think they're gonna have any trouble maximizing his value. The teams with the type of trade e capital to go after Watson aren't sniffing around Wentz and Darnold. Carr, maybe but that only takes one team out of the mix.
  3. I don't see it that way. Caserio walked into a situation that was already nuclear.
  4. A trade can't become official for another month. There's no rush on Houston's part. They can take the next five weeks to continue to try to smooth things over with Watson. It isn't like they're going to have any difficulties drumming up a trade market for him if/when they decide to do it.
  5. Yeah, the talk that Wentz is gonna fetch a 1st has me rattled. Teams are ridiculously desperate at QB right now.
  6. Yep, my good buddy Eagles fan texted me during the game last night: Good to see the Andy of my teens and 20s back and alive and well.
  7. Sure will be ironic if we end up trading up to #3. Then we'll know exactly what that win against the WFT cost us.
  8. I think if a deal for Watson can't materialize, that's plan B.
  9. Yep. OT quality and depth is at an all-time low IMO. Coaches want all the elite jumbo athletes playing defense. For the most part, you only end up on the OL after they figure out that you aren't athletic enough to hack it on the DL.
  10. Yeah, they abandoned the run VERY early on. I get that the Bucs are a great run D, but you can't just flat out abandon the run early especially when you're struggling to pass protect.
  11. I absolutely expected Reid and Bieniemy to scheme around their weaknesses at OT. They went full Rivera/Shula though.
  12. No, Marty would rather mortgage the future to take a small school QB to try to convert him to a WR or an undersized DE with only one move who he swore had a 1st round grade? QB? Nah, that's not worth mortgaging the future for.
  13. Yeah, Tre ain't wrong but Tre ain't the caliber of player to be throwing shade.
  14. I don't think so. His production took a big jump once we signed a legit outside WR so that he could primarily operate out of the slot. He never looked comfortable on the outside IMO.
  15. It'd REALLY make sense if we did it after getting Moton extended long-term.
  16. We've needed a LT since Gross retired. Well, we did find one briefly in Oher and then concussions derailed him. I'm still baffled why we haven't given Moton a longer look at LT.
  17. This. A lot of those gadget plays we drew up for Samuel will likely be going to CMC next year. We just didn't have CMC and Samuel was the best fill in we had.
  18. We can free up significant capital with some targeted moved. Releasing Teddy and Short as post-June 1st moves. Releasing Weatherly. Those moves are no brainers and free up significant cap space. Hell, maybe we can find a team dumb enough and desperate enough to trade something (anything) for Teddy's contract.
  19. Yeah, Teddy was the one who really faltered once film was available on him playing in our system. That's not at all surprising. Hell, it's exactly what I said would happen.
  20. Depends on his market value. I think someone will likely overpay. We never really got to see what Robbie might be capable of in Brady's system because his strength is going deep and Teddy's deep ball is trash.
  21. That Taylor CB from Washington stood out IMO. Love the Senior Bowl for stuff like that. Honestly, he wasn't even on my radar before the Senior Bowl, but he looked good.
  22. I wouldn't. Samuel's production is easier to replace than Robbie's. There's a reason why outside guys get PAID and slot receivers don't. This year's draft has a lot of intriguing slot receivers in the mid-rounds.
×
×
  • Create New...