Davidson Deac II

Only team that could possibly take him now would be the Rams if they want to try him as a replacement for Stafford when he retires.

It would be ironic if he ends up with Cleveland.

Be interesting to see the reaction if Sanders drops to the second round.

I was looking at his last mock draft. It was a guess of where guys will get drafted. Of course, he probably has 50 of them, like most of these analyst do. And most of them are wrong and don't really know who will end up the better player. We have Macmillan, just have to see how it works out. I was listening to some guy on the radio who said we should have taken golden because he is faster. Sometimes I think speed gets overrated just a bit. Shiftiness and agility might be more important than running a 4.45 vs running a 4.3.

Given that he so far has gotten just about every pick wrong, not sure his opinion matters much. But I do admit the pick surprises me.

Every single pick we make

It also works for them because they have great qb play. And we play in a bad division.

We may want to trade down, but I don't think anyone will offer enough to make it worthwhile.

Well, didn't say we had a great chance, but we have a chance. In truth, the difference between winning and losing in the NFL is just a few players. If Bryce continues to improve, if the Oline stays healthy, and if the defense can get up to barely adequate, we would have a shot. Especially if the other teams in the division struggle.

Personally, I think we have a shot at the playoffs this year if several things happen. If the offense plays like it did towards the end of last season If the defense improves even 10 spots. If special teams can make a few plays. Not saying we will make the playoffs, but I think we aren't in as bad a shape as some think we are. So no changes to the oline unless its to pick up some depth.

I don't have much to say about it, but I wouldn't complain if someone offered us several picks for our spot so they could get Sanders. Assuming he is still available when we pick.

Duke choked. Had the game won, but some bad inbounding along with some good shooting at the end by Houston killed them.

Agreed, but I wanted to avoid that discussion.

Somewhat ironic that Tampa is making playoff runs (albeit in a weak division) while Cleveland has to dig itself out of a hole. Baker Mayfield wasn't the problem in Cleveland.

IMO, it was already off the table unless some guy we like falls to us in late rounds. And that could still happen.

Giving details would be insane. Best to play it close to the vest and ensure we don't give any clues as to who we might take.

I disagree. Our qb play has been very consistent. Consistently bad.

Relax bud, its not like we are discussing BBQ.

Not a chance.

I don't understand why anyone would care. While cheating sucks, I would guess that 80% or more of professional athletes have cheated on their spouse. Not really a story.

There are people who believe the playin games don't count as tournamanent wins or losses. I am kind of meh about it.

I don't know if its so much that Johnson was great at hitting on picks as it was that he just had a lot of them. For example, he had something like five first round picks, three seconds, and five third rounders all in a two year period.

I think Hankton had one year where he caught a few balls. My point was that they both are or were way down on the depth chart.

Yeah. I get amused sometimes at how obsessed fans are over the 4th and 5th receivers. All we need is someone who can fill in reliably if the others guys get hurt or on the rare occasion we run 4 receivers. And is a decent to good special teams player. Doesn't have to be a superstar. Moore can do that. He is basically Karl Hankton.

It just seems to me that the key to winning in balance your picks and cap space across you team. With the exception qb, you don't need to have top 5 player at every position. We don't really need to spend a first on WR. If we do, great and I hope it works out, but we need to pick up someone who has good hands and get downfield.