Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Position upgrade that would improve our team the most? Why?


Gin and Juice

Recommended Posts

With all the talk about need a stud LT, do we really need a "stud"? The OL success comes as a unit, right? Been said countless times that OL is about chemistry.....not one great player! Does our OL need to improve? Yes, but it won't with one player....we had a pro bowl LT and we were mediocre at best on our OL. Stud LT the BPA for our team? I'm thinking not! What fixes our OL then? Discuss! ***save the cam can't throw from the ground**** I want depth in the response

Is a big play WR our BPA? I don't think so, however, a WR that commands double teams opens up our run game. Better run game keeps opposing Defenses honest, right? Upgrading our guards improve the run game? A true run blocking RT and RG? What says you? Cyril Richardson or Ja'Wann James truly our second Rd BPAs?

RB? Sure we claim to have a loaded stable. But, do we really? If the next AP is up for grabs, does that improve our team the most?

DE? We all know the cap issue and DG likes to fill the roster before the draft. Because of the cap, his philosophy is handcuffed. Will a stud DE be our BPA?

DT? As fans, we think we are set. Those big guys tire easily. Does three or more "starting" caliber DTs make our team better?

LB? We know the trials and tribulations of TD! He is an important piece! Does having a stand by guy of TD talent make our team better?

CB? Personally, I think a true shut down CB is the upgrade that improves our team the most! A guy that can truly cancel out the opposition's no.1. It's a no brainer in that the blitz package with our front seven can get stupid good! In turn, we create more turnover opportunities! My opinion only tho.

S? Shut down corner and our front seven the ballhawks at S should thrive!

Now, what are the risk that may cause our front seven to regress? Being on the field longer? Does having a better DL rotation improve our team the most?

I ask these question because I find BPA to be a relative term. He has to be the BPA for the team! I ask, what is that one positional upgrade that makes us a better team! It's not a stud LT, we had one and our OL was shabby at times!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if we had a stud LT on a shabby line and he's gone now, what word would you use to describe the OL now? poo? i would.

 

you are insane if you think adding either a stud LT or WR wouldn't help the team more than any other positions. same could bebsaid about corner. we've got crappy choices. all three positions are weak. WR was  decimated and we've barely done anything to rebuild what we had that wasn't all that good to begin with. the OL was weak and made incredibly weaker and we've done NOTHING to help it out. 

 

if we don't address those two areas seriously during the draft in the first three rounds, we aren't getting better next year. upgrades there would absolutely help the team more than anything else.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the talk about need a stud LT, do we really need a "stud"? The OL success comes as a unit, right? Been said countless times that OL is about chemistry.....not one great player! Does our OL need to improve? Yes, but it won't with one player....we had a pro bowl LT and we were mediocre at best on our OL. Stud LT the BPA for our team? I'm thinking not! What fixes our OL then? Discuss! ***save the cam can't throw from the ground**** I want depth in the response

Is a big play WR our BPA? I don't think so, however, a WR that commands double teams opens up our run game. Better run game keeps opposing Defenses honest, right? Upgrading our guards improve the run game? A true run blocking RT and RG? What says you? Cyril Richardson or Ja'Wann James truly our second Rd BPAs?

RB? Sure we claim to have a loaded stable. But, do we really? If the next AP is up for grabs, does that improve our team the most?

DE? We all know the cap issue and DG likes to fill the roster before the draft. Because of the cap, his philosophy is handcuffed. Will a stud DE be our BPA?

DT? As fans, we think we are set. Those big guys tire easily. Does three or more "starting" caliber DTs make our team better?

LB? We know the trials and tribulations of TD! He is an important piece! Does having a stand by guy of TD talent make our team better?

CB? Personally, I think a true shut down CB is the upgrade that improves our team the most! A guy that can truly cancel out the opposition's no.1. It's a no brainer in that the blitz package with our front seven can get stupid good! In turn, we create more turnover opportunities! My opinion only tho.

S? Shut down corner and our front seven the ballhawks at S should thrive!

Now, what are the risk that may cause our front seven to regress? Being on the field longer? Does having a better DL rotation improve our team the most?

I ask these question because I find BPA to be a relative term. He has to be the BPA for the team! I ask, what is that one positional upgrade that makes us a better team! It's not a stud LT, we had one and our OL was shabby at times!

 

thats muh boy, who needs WR aim i right guys? what we need is RB, LB, DE in that order, thats how you win

 

OT is hit and miss from my pov..................... yeah offinsivelineman can come off the street and play. i mean like go to a frat house and find the five fatest bros and suit them up. it's all chemistry fellas

 

hurn dog out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if we had a stud LT on a shabby line and he's gone now, what word would you use to describe the OL now? poo? i would.

you are insane if you think adding either a stud LT or WR wouldn't help the team more than any other positions. same could bebsaid about corner. we've got crappy choices. all three positions are weak. WR was decimated and we've barely done anything to rebuild what we had that wasn't all that good to begin with. the OL was weak and made incredibly weaker and we've done NOTHING to help it out.

if we don't address those two areas seriously during the draft in the first three rounds, we aren't getting better next year. upgrades there would absolutely help the team more than anything else.

Damn dude. You think were gonna have a losing season. Don't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I won't argue that the fear of regressing is valid. But OL is about chemistry, not individuals

 

LOL that is terrible logic. Why not put 4 of my buddies and myself in there we got great chemistry. If 3 or 4 of the OL individually suck I don't care how much chemistry they have. 

 

If you look at the top teams they all have elite OL such as 49ers and Hawks. 

 

Do you think our OL can hold up against the Seahawks Defense? Did you see what they did to Peyton Manning and their elite group of WRs/TE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats muh boy, who needs WR aim i right guys? what we need is RB, LB, DE in that order, thats how you win

OT is hit and miss from my pov..................... yeah offinsivelineman can come off the street and play. i mean like go to a frat house and find the five fatest bros and suit them up. it's all chemistry fellas

hurn dog out

No, just no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL that is terrible logic. Why not put 4 of my buddies and myself in there we got great chemistry. If 3 or 4 of the OL individually suck I don't care how much chemistry they have.

If you look at the top teams they all have elite OL such as 49ers and Hawks.

Do you think our OL can hold up against the Seahawks Defense? Did you see what they did to Peyton Manning and their elite group of WRs/TE?

The hawks don't have an elite line, they can run block but not good in pass pro. But chemistry and continuity are really important on the oline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL that is terrible logic. Why not put 4 of my buddies and myself in there we got great chemistry. If 3 or 4 of the OL individually suck I don't care how much chemistry they have.

If you look at the top teams they all have elite OL such as 49ers and Hawks.

Do you think our OL can hold up against the Seahawks Defense? Did you see what they did to Peyton Manning and their elite group of WRs/TE?

I'm never said the OL doesn't need to improve! It needed to improve when we had a pro bowl LT. A stud LT does not make us better than last year, keeps us the same! Assuming we have a competent LT, what would make our OL better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn dude. You think were gonna have a losing season. Don't you?

didn't say that. i just don't see us doing better.

unless we do something to fix the OL and bring in at least one real receiving threat i think we'll be taking a step backward and while i don't expect it to be big enough for a losing season, it wouldn't surprise me.

if we really stick to this whole bpa thing, it's very likely that we go into the season with the offense as is. that isn't a good thing regardless of what that DL or LB corps looks like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...