Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ealy is not a good pass rusher?


Recommended Posts

what do y'all think?

before the draft Mayock downgraded Ealy in his rankings to below DE Stephon Tuitt (who was drafted at #46)

Greg Cosell on Ealy:

"I wouldn't necessarily call him explosive, he'll need work to become a true pass rusher."

Sports Illustrated:

"I wasn’t as in love with Ealy’s tape as were the people who graded him as a can’t miss first-round prospect...In the right scheme, Ealy could be a better-than-average pass rusher, and he has the pure strength to stop the run as a strong-side end."

Rotoworld:

"Ealy lacks explosive edge-rush ability and may be.best suited as a hold-the-point left end... An overdraft does appear likely... Ealy has frequently been mentioned among first-rounders since December, and although his production matches the projection, his overall play might not....We'd let someone else take the risk...Former NFL scout Russ Lande believes Michael Sam "jumped off film" more than Missouri edge player Kony Ealy. "Four games in (and) I do not see the hype for Kony Ealy to be a high draft pick. Michael Sam jumped off film more in games evaluated," Lande tweeted"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4.92 40 is concerning, but he had a 1.72 10 yard split.  To put that in perspective, Robert Quinn had a 1.69, JJ Watt had a 1.71.  Clowney's 10 yard split was a 1.59.  What this says is that Ealy doesn't have elite top end speed, but his initial burst is pretty damn good.  For a DE, initial burst is extremely important while top end spend rarely enters the equation.  If your DE is running 40 yards in a straight line, then either something really good happened or something really bad happened.  Either way, it doesn't come into play very often.

 

What jumps out to me about Ealy is his 3 cone.  He hit a 6.83 in the 3 cone.  To put that in perspective, LeSean McCoy is one of the shiftiest RBs in the NFL and his 3 cone was a 6.82. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for the sake of the team lets hope he's a beast rusher..............the one pick IMO that must not backfire

 

I agree.  DE is a position of strength currently.  Hell, we may have the best pair of 4-3 DEs in the league right now.  If you're gonna take a guy at that position in this situation, you better not fug it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My biggest fear with him and KB have nothing to do with physical attributes.  Both he and KB can be dominant if they choose to be and their mind allows.  I say that because those 2 scored a 7 and a 10 respectively on the Wonderlic.  Those are VERY low scores.  By comparison, people were scared of Cam because he scored a 21 which is twice as good as Ealy, and 3 times better than KB.  This is important if they can't grasp the offense and what needs to be done.  Fact of the matter though is, both are extremely physically gifted and as long as they understand the playbook, and are motivated, they can be out of this world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My biggest fear with him and KB have nothing to do with physical attributes.  Both he and KB can be dominant if they choose to be and their mind allows.  I say that because those 2 scored a 7 and a 10 respectively on the Wonderlic.  Those are VERY low scores.  By comparison, people were scared of Cam because he scored a 21 which is twice as good as Ealy, and 3 times better than KB.  This is important if they can't grasp the offense and what needs to be done.  Fact of the matter though is, both are extremely physically gifted and as long as they understand the playbook, and are motivated, they can be out of this world.

 

Fortunately, they don't play positions that require a lot of thought.  Historically, QBs and OL are your smartest players.  I want LBs and safeties to be smart too because they're having to analyze a lot of action.  DE?  Pin your ears back and go.  WR?  Is the CB playing press or off?  Are they running zone or man?  Is the safety dropping or is he trying to squat on my route?  The reads for a WR are relatively simple.  He's not analyzing the full scheme, just the one or two guys on his side and those reads are fairly simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonderlic scores mean absolutely nothing unless you're a QB and even then they aren't that important because the questions you are being asked aren't your typical memory questions like who was the first president of the United States, from what I hear a lot of them are based on mathematics.

QB's literally have to memorize everything because in their calls they are calling out the routes and the protection, on top of that they have to remember the protection and where the specific routes are going.

Positions like DE, WR, TE, DT, OL, etc... you just have to know your assignment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I do rate Tuitt higher myself, he ended up being drafted higher so I don't have a problem.

 

Highest 3 cone and 10 split is probably a better reflection of his ability to turn the corner than a straight 40 as already mentioned.

 

He also got more attention than Sam did from offenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other thing to consider is football intelligence vs. book smarts. I don't think anyone is going to try to argue that guys like Lawrence Taylor and Randy Moss were candidates for the Noble Prize, but everyone who worked with them during their NFL careers raves about their football intelligence.  Some guys just get it.  Based on what Rivera and Gettleman said, KB certainly seems like one of those guys.  Both Rivera and Gettleman raved about how KB absorbed the info they threw at him and how he performed on the white board breaking down difference plays and scenarios.  That means a helluva lot more than how he performs on some standardized test that has absolutely nothing to do with football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My concern more than the 40 is his terrible vertical, and that seems to indicate a true lack of explosiveness.  However nothing in the combine really matters to me and his tape is pretty good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...