Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We are too young to add 3 draft picks


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

We will not be picking rookies up at all three draft picks. This team is already very VERY young. Adding 3 rookies, no matter how good, is silly. We might keep #9 (Gordon, Staus, McDerp) and package the #24 pick/Henderson/Biz to get a proven Veteran.

 

Afflalo is the guy everyone is banking on. We will have to see, but I would hope we get a vet backup PG, SF and C out of free agency/trades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that we will not have 3 draft picks on the team.

 

Options:

1. Package #24 & 2nd round to move up as much as we can to get "our guy"

* Most we could go up on that package is probably #6

(Odds aren't good because there might not be a lot that separates #9 and #6.)

 

2. Pick a big at #9 and package #24 and Player for Affalo or a player like him.

* Picking big means Gordon

 

3. Stay put at #9 & #24 and Eurostash the 2nd round pick

* What I want. Give me Staus at #9. #24 give me Napier or Payne if either fall.

 

4. Who the hell knows but it's fun to guess!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no way anyone is trading us a top 10 to take #24 and a second rounder.

We're taking a scorer at #9. Gordon will be off the board already. The Bobcatsian pick would be McBuckets, but his defense scares the hell out of me and he's going to be way too slow to rebound at an average rate for his height.

Keep an eye out for Rodney Hood, Stauskas, Dougie, even Gary Harris (solid defender, but a reach at that pick).

I'd like to see us trade out of #9 and pick an x-factor type at #24.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no way anyone is trading us a top 10 to take #24 and a second rounder.

We're taking a scorer at #9. Gordon will be off the board already. The Bobcatsian pick would be McBuckets, but his defense scares the hell out of me and he's going to be way too slow to rebound at an average rate for his height.

Keep an eye out for Rodney Hood, Stauskas, Dougie, even Gary Harris (solid defender, but a reach at that pick).

I'd like to see us trade out of #9 and pick an x-factor type at #24.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

I would take Harris over those guys with Stauskas right behind him. I don't think Harris is a reach at all. I see him being similar to Oladipo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That 45th pick could be valuable. Clifford is on record saying that he won't go into a season without three point guards on the roster.

 

A guy like Jordan Clarkson or Jahii Carson could be there and instead of having to re-sign Pargo we can just pay one of these guys 450,000 a year to be the third string point guard. In comparison, Pargo is making nearly $1.5 mil. So in actuality we could save about $1 mil in cap space doing this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason I'm hesitant to trade #9 to Orlando is because they could potentially be a juggernaut of a team down the road.

 

PG: Dante Exum (Draft 4th Overall)

SG: Victor Oladipo

SF: James Young (Draft 12th Overall)

PF: Aaron Gordon (Draft 9th Overall)

C: Nikola Vucevic

 

That is a great starting line-up for the future, I don't think I want to help them out like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep the number 9 pick, we were lucky to get it. For a team thats on the way up we might not get a shot at the top talent for a while. I still want us to draft one more guy that could develop into a allstar player down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...