Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Qatar busted for bribing FIFA officials to ****** World Cup away from USA


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

There is a thread in Soccer forum but this is big! US might actually get a World Cup in 2022 if this gains steam and it looks like it will. Charlotte was on the list of cities that would host World Cup game. This could be huge for the US and city of Charlotte.

Here's an article from BBC if anyone cares to read.

 

 

Aren't all world sporting events bribed by the host cities? I'd guess the Olympic selection committee is probably even more corrupt than FIFA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charlotte host the World Cup.  that will never happen.

 

 

I was wondering how could Charlotte possibly hold a World Cup when they don't have the infrostructure to host a Superbowl but then I realized we were talking about the year 2022 and who knows what can happen between now and then. Plus, I have absolutely no idea what it takes to host something like but I would think it would have to be second to the Olympics right?

 

Speaking of which, I heard on the radio that all but 2 countries (Kazakhstan and China) have dropped out of hosting the 2022 Olympics. Apparently the cost of putting it together and then dealing with all the infrostructure that is no longer needed when every goes home is ecomonically crippling for any host nation now.   

 

No city hosts the world cup. A country does and hosts games in a bunch of different cities. Charlotte should have no problem hosting a game although not the semis or finals probably (as pstall says) as that would be more of a superbowl type draw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can find the guidelines out there. Basically you need a stadium with over 40k to host WC games. You need a 90k stadium to host the opener or the final. Just keep in mind we have had World Cups in South Africa and now the Amazon jungle. The infrastructure requirements are lax compared to a Super Bowl.

 

I think its a moot point because Charlotte was not part of our bid to the WC. They were preliminarily included but ultimately better destination cities were chosen. Charlotte is a fine city but not an international tourist destination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No city hosts the world cup. A country does and hosts games in a bunch of different cities. Charlotte should have no problem hosting a game although not the semis or finals probably (as pstall says) as that would be more of a superbowl type draw.

Agreed. Cities don't have to be large or well-connected to be a host city: Brazil picked the capitals of each of the 12 states in the country, and as a result have 7 stadiums which hold less than 50,000 and the smallest host city having a population of 550,000. Charlotte would only host a few group stages so would have an influx of fans of the nations playing there. Charlotte is much, much better connected to the rest of the country than other previous host cities, and has a stadium a short walk from the city centre which is especially rare.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...