Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

49ers playoff game


ChinaPanther

Recommended Posts

The offense needs to make a minor adjustment this year I think. We always snapped the ball with 1 second on the play clock. They need to vary when they snap the ball this year. The 49ers in the playoff game picked up that we always snapped the ball on 1 and that helped them get a good pass rush against us. Does anybody think the coaching staff picked up on that in the playoff game? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The offense needs to make a minor adjustment this year I think. We always snapped the ball with 1 second on the play clock. They need to vary when they snap the ball this year. The 49ers in the playoff game picked up that we always snapped the ball on 1 and that helped them get a good pass rush against us. Does anybody think the coaching staff picked up on that in the playoff game? 

 

I actually hope they do fix that because they were doing it so well they offsided twice towards the end of the game and the refs didn't even call it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually hope they do fix that because they were doing it so well they offsided twice towards the end of the game and the refs didn't even call it. 

 

That's got me a little worried but it's not that big of an adjustment. Hopefully they fix that this season also. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9ers game doesn't phase me much.   Ref rulings seemed lopsided that game,  letting the 9er WRs get away with headbutt after headbutt,  but one of our guys even scrape a 9er helmet....and it's an automatic flag for 15 yards,  every.single.time.

 

The good news was,  up in Seattle,  it seemed like the Seahawks could do no wrong,  and the 9ers got what was coming to them.    Even if it wasn't at our hands,   it still felt good to see. Sadly.

 

 

 

The game that ticked me off was the Saints game in N.O.   Every time our defense hit anyone of their offense with any kind of force,  the ref threw the flag.   The refs literally took the toughness out of our defense that game...by the second half,  you could see our defense just basically gave up and stopped really trying.   Saints defense was the only defense allowed to run around and be physical that night. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...