Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PG needs


Chuckie

Recommended Posts

After looking at the free agent PG that are available who do you think we should target? Do we go after a top PG and let Kemal assume the backup PG role?

Not a fan of Luke returning as it looked like the team was a mess when he was in charge of the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the point guard options

Starters

Kyle Lowry

Isaiah Thomas

Eric Bledsoe

Top Tier Back Up's

Avery Bradley (RFA)

Ramon Sessions

Darren Collison

Kirk Hinrich

Shaun Livingston

Greivis Vasquez (RFA)

Patty Mills

Mo Williams

Mid Tier Back Up's

Shelvin Mack (RFA)

Jerryd Bayless

Devin Harris

Aaron Brooks

Jordan Farmar

Mario Chalmers

Brian Roberts (RFA)

Low Tier Back Up's

Luke Ridnour

Beno Udrih

Steve Blake

E'Twaun Moore

Third String

Nando de Colo (RFA)

Earl Watson

Toney Douglas

Jimmer Fredette

Jannero Pargo

Tyshawn Taylor

I'll take Hinrich and Taylor...

Kemba Walker, Kirk Hinrich, Tyshawn Taylor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kirk Hinrich and either a younger PG or sign Sessions

Some other names Vasquez and Bradley

 

I'd like Hinrich or Devin Harris because both are 6'3, but Hinrich is begging Chicago to re-sign him, which they probably will do, and there's a good chance Harris could end back up in Dallas. Either Darren Collison or Jordan Crawford would work if they don't try to overvalue themselves too much. 

 

It'll probably end up being Sessions, since he wants to be back in Charlotte, and they can probably pay him much less because of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...