Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

XBOX1 owners! EA for $30 a year unlimited access..


jasonluckydog

Recommended Posts

This is the direction I expected games to go. And frankly, if you have the option to "rent" a game through this system before plunking down $60, then there is real value there.

There has been some negative flack around this idea, but how would this be different than Netflix? Assuming the selection increases.

Sent from my VS980 4G using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't see why this is a bad idea, only way it is bad if they take away the option to buy the game and it's an exclusive for this service.....I remember having "a Sega Channel", the games changed monthly but unlimited access during that time with all features, surprised it's just now bring tried again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sony has responded, lol

 

Sony claims EA's Xbox One subscription service isn't 'good value'

By Tom Warren on 

 

July 30, 2014 07:08 am

 @tomwarren

 

http://www.theverge.com/2014/7/30/5951131/sony-ea-access-subscription-service-not-good-value

Electronic Arts surprised gamers with a subscription service for Xbox One yesterday, but Sony is less than impressed with the offering. EA Access lets Xbox One owners play titles like FIFA 14Madden NFL 25Peggle 2, and Battlefield 4 for just $4.99 a month, or $29.99 per year. Despite what seems like a good deal, with more games coming soon, Sony claims the program is not good value for PlayStation 4 owners. "We evaluated the EA Access subscription offering and decided that it does not bring the kind of value PlayStation customers have come to expect," a Sony spokesperson told Game Informer. "We don't think asking our fans to pay an additional $5 a month for this EA-specific program represents good value to the PlayStation gamer."

Sony appears

 

 

if you read the comments the PS fans are pissed and the XBOX homers are swinging their dicks extra long today.

 

lol

"Sony is that twelve-year-old who just lost an argument but has to have the last word and just yells “Well you’re fat and nobody likes you!” and storms out of the room."

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read somewhere that a good reason for Sony to pass on the EA package was because of the direct competition with PSN's game subscription.

Time will tell though. If we could get a video game Netflix...

But I am reminded of what EA did to dungeon keeper and how they have the ability to destroy anything!

Sent from my VS980 4G using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...