Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you want to see how the game should be played (Broncos vs. Colts)


MedellinHeel

Recommended Posts

I just shake my head at the people who claim you must have a slow time of possession running O to be able to have an elite D. 

 

It is actually just the opposite. If your D is bad you want to use a slow time of possession O to keep your poor D off the field. In a sense you hide them. 

 

Basically you go and score quick, D gets a 3 and out on the 1st or 3rd possession. O comes back on the field and scores again. D goes out and gets another quick 3 and out. Rinse and repeat. This leads to blow outs. 

 

Broncos are doing what every team should aspire to. Domination on BOTH sides of the ball.  

 

Fug this only scoring 17-24 points every game. We have one of the most dynamic QBs in the game. 

 

We fugging absolutly DOMINATED TB today for 3.5 quarters and they almost won the bloody game. No excuse for that poo. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is a Grand Canyon-sized chasm between your opinion and the opinions of most former player hockey guys who do this for a living.
    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
×
×
  • Create New...