Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

89 Conference Call


therealmjl

Recommended Posts

If he does it consistently for sixteen games and the playoffs, then it'll be discredited.

 

Whatever.  Everyone should know that the only thing that will stop Smitty from competing consistently is an injury, and injuries can happen to anyone (and are a bit of a red herring when judging someone as tough as Smitty's competitiveness).

 

You and others can fool yourselves all you like if it will make yourselves feel better.  I've seen all that I need to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever.  Everyone should know that the only thing that will stop Smitty from competing consistently is an injury, and injuries can happen to anyone (and are a bit of a red herring when judging someone as tough as Smitty's competitiveness).

 

You and others can fool yourselves all you like if it will make yourselves feel better.  I've seen all that I need to see.

 

Injuries happen a lot more to guys who are 35 years old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bullpoo back to you, the lack of help 89 did or didn't have in say 2005 has nothing to do with why he is a Panther today.

89 is a grumpy diva. That is why the old man version who isn't a big playmaker isn't here. Bc he isn't the ultimate team player.....and that trait is how old WRs stay on rosters instead of being rented guns

 

Look, man, I don't give a poo why Steve Smith is not a Panther today. That's already been discussed.  My opinion is that he still should be a Panther today because he is as tough and competitive a football player as you will ever see, and he still has enough left in the tank where he would have helped our offense this year.  Like 89, that's the bottom line. 

 

We put up with Smitty for 13 years, and we could have put up with it a couple of more.  When he was on the team, people loved him on the field. Now that he's gone, people are talking about him like he is an old, broke down demon.  I don't like it, and I don't buy it.  Simple as that.

 

We can agree to disagree all we want about general preferences of the disposition of personnel, but don't try to piss on me and tell me it's raining about Steve Smith's ability, competitive nature, or the way that he was axed from the team, because I am gonna call "Bullshit!" everytime.  In my opinion, Smitty deserved more than that, and deserves more than that now. And, like I have alluded to in multiple threads that have come up this offseason, I think that it's shameful and not befitting of an intelligent or mature fan base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bullpoo back to you, the lack of help 89 did or didn't have in say 2005 has nothing to do with why he is a Panther today.

89 is a grumpy diva. That is why the old man version who isn't a big playmaker isn't here. Bc he isn't the ultimate team player.....and that trait is how old WRs stay on rosters instead of being rented guns

 

going along to get along is a poor ending for a player who is as intense as SS. He is still making plays because of his intensity . I have no clue why many here would want to have a player that was dumbed down and playing like he is on medication. He is the ultimate team player because he gives everything he has in every game. In this sport that is the ultimate goal and most desirable of traits. He is certainly not an "old man" version of himself yet. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like he did all the other young receivers before Benjamin? :unsure:

 

I'd add your first sentence isn't proven until he does it consistently for more than just the first three or four weeks.

 

And a GM's job is to win games, not make players happy.

 

removing SS was to make players happy so I do agree with your point about GM's job. Yes SS gave the opportunity for the others to get better he showed them every day what they needed to do. Being given an opportunity and taking an opportunity is up to the other receivers. I think that is the rub as many would want him to hold their hands and walk them through.He won't give them a fish , but...

  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

removing SS was to make players happy so I do agree with your point about GM's job. Yes SS gave the opportunity for the others to get better he showed them every day what they needed to do. Being given an opportunity and taking an opportunity is up to the other receivers. I think that is the rub as many would want him to hold their hands and walk them through.He won't give them a fish , but...

 

Smith wasn't cut to make players happy.  He was cut to make the team better.

 

Argue all you want about whether it achieves that result or not, but that is the true 'why' of it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smith wasn't cut to make players happy.  He was cut to make the team better.

 

Argue all you want about whether it achieves that result or not, but that is the true 'why' of it.

 

 

no , this has been discussed. He was cut so Cam could take over the team,and because many didn't like his attitude and the "old man version". He was cut to make G-man and other players happy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was cut because he apparently rubbed the GM the wrong way.  G-man went through his antics for a year and decided that his antics weren't worth the trouble.  

 

The idea that Gettleman would make decisions based off personal likes and dislikes is silly.

 

That's the kind of theory that comes from a pissed off fan upset about his favorite player being cut, not someone looking at the situation rationally.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's funny how the teams with the great QBs stay at or near the top of the league every season.  Yes it is a team game, but the QB has the biggest impact in most NFL football games. 
    • Look, no one is ever a perfect player.  Since the QB handles the ball on 100% of plays offensively (unless there's a direct snap to a RB or something), I can absolutely see where they get an outsized blame and gain from what happens at any given snap of a football game.   Theoretically, there shouldn't even be a stat or idea to a 4th quarter comeback or game winning drive because you should already have done that during the game.  Losers!  Right?  Just because you win late doesn't take away the fact you tried to lose the game for your team! I'm not a fan of that opinion, but again, I'm just a moron with a keyboard.   Bryce has limited tools.  Bryce has not inspired the same level of confidence in us as Cam Newton did in year 3.  I certainly get that.  We traded a TON of assets to get Bryce, and we still suck.  (I mean, since we've lost games, we're losers right?) I completely understand that some fans are just unhappy with a limited QB and a team that isn't performing well, unless the other teams are worse losers than we are. I will say this:  Bryce will fight until the end.  Sure, he's has some real loser football.   But in close games, he's doing his best to comeback (even against a winner of prevent D). Now is it better or worse if your QB plays their best ball in the first half and sucks 2nd half so long as they finish with 300 yards, 3 TDs for your fantasy points? Who said stats are for winners anyway?  The Panthers and Bryce has a long way to go.  I'm enjoying the winning right now.  Though I do start each game thinking "how will we fug this up today?" Because it's been such a poo show in the Tepper era.  Will he prove to be a legit starting NFL QB?  Maybe not here as evidence by our record with QBs who were high draft picks.  
    • Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.
×
×
  • Create New...