Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thurs Night Football: Giants at Redskins (rivalry game)


gettlemanjack

Recommended Posts

Scott Allen @ScottSAllen 29m

Before the game, Bill Cowher said Kirk Cousins is the future of

the Redskins. It ain't looking bright...

Andy Ruther @ AndyRuther 1m

Kirk Cousins playing quarterback is way more offensive than

the name "Redskins"

Keith @ KeithLHHockey 1m

Kirk "playing like both of his parents were" Cousins .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offensive Tweets™ @TooMessedUp 4m

BREAKING NEWS: RGIII tore several abdominal muscles while

laughing at Kirk Cousins ' performance tonight.

A-Skins-Luva @ kgrizzard 53s

I guess we fans can safely say that after Cousins play tonight,

that there is NO QB Controversy in Washington! Do we even

have a QB?

Gary Owen @garyowencomedy 3m

I dont who's playing better for the Giants Eli Manning or Kirk

Cousins .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, so I know what happened. Somebody showed Cousins some of Hope Solo's crotch shots right before the game. We should do that to Flacco.

Before anybody says anything, it wouldn't have done any good against Rothlisberger. He'd have just played with a boner.

She could kick your ass. Soon as she gets off the floor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deadskins fall to the bottom of the NFC East barrell! Blown out badly at home by the Giants! Dreams of having a decent QB destroyed!

 

RG3 is better than Cousins when healthy..... the best thing about the rg3 injury, is people will now look at the team as a WHOLE, and see he was the least of their problems

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You might want to re-read that. They're specifically saying they DON'T use stats. They arbitrarily judge each play and then extrapolate that into a grade.
    • You're correct (on its face). But PFF does indeed use advanced stats to come up with their grades. Not trying to turn this into a debate about PFF (at all because it's been done ad nauseum), but here is how PFF explains it:   GRADES VS. STATS We aren’t grading players based on the yardage they rack up or the stats they collect. Statistics can be indicative of performance but don’t tell the whole story and can often lie badly. Quarterbacks can throw the ball straight to defenders but if the ball is dropped, you won't see it on the stat sheet. Conversely, they can dump the ball off on a sequence of screen passes and end up with a gaudy looking stat line if those skill position players do enough work after the catch. PFF grades the play, not its result, so the quarterback that throws the ball to defenders will be downgraded whether the defender catches the ball to notch the interception on the stat sheet or not. No amount of broken tackles and yards after the catch from a bubble screen will earn a quarterback a better grade, even though his passing stats may be getting padded. The same is true for most positions. Statistics can be misleading. A tackle whose quarterback gets the ball out of his hands quicker than anybody else may not give up many sacks, but he can still be beaten often and earn a poor grade. Receivers that are targeted relentlessly could post big-time numbers but may offer little more than the product of a volume-based aerial attack. https://www.pff.com/grades So PFF uses stats to come up with player grades and rankings.  
×
×
  • Create New...