Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Need to go at least 6-5 the rest of the way to go 9-7 & possibly win NFCS, 3 gimme games left


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Home teams have completely destroyed the road teams this year on TNF 

 

Giants just beat the snot out of the Redskins on the road the other week.

 

At the end of the day, considering how we looked against Pittsburgh and Baltimore (and no matter what anyone wants to blame it on, it DID happen), there is no way anyone can consider a game against New Orleans a gimme.  No game against Brees and Payton is a gimme game, no matter how much we may or may not like them.

 

Now do I think we will win that game?  I don't know, possibly.  New Orleans on the road on a short week isn't a good mix.  But it will still be a game we have to be at our best for.  It's a division foe who will be clawing for the playoffs just like we will be.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, after CIN, GB, and SEA, our games should all be won.

 

We have the Saints on Thursday so it's a short weak after a probably physical game against SEA, but we are comfortable with the Saints, so the short week won't hurt preparation. Also, with the Saints being away, we should have a distinct home-field advantage against their putrid D. 

 

We then have the longest possible break outside of a bye week before playing Philly (Thursday night to Monday night). This gives us all the time we need to gameplan for Philly's O and get back healthy.

 

Then home against ATL. Should I say more?

 

We then get a bye week before going to MIN. This game scares me the most, but I think we finally get healthy after the bye week and our team comes out ready to shut down the Vikings.

 

Going to NO next should be a win considering the Saints don't even seem to have the same dominating home atmosphere this year, although that could change as the season progresses (this game is another toss up, but I still believe that we should come out of it with a win).

 

Then TB and the Browns will be two teams playing for draft positioning in BoA. Those are easy wins.

 

Finally, in what is becoming a staple of the Panthers, we will close our season in ATL, and as usual we will come away with the win as our team looks to carry our winning momentum into the playoffs.

 

 

If we lose the next three and the two potential losses I am seeing, then we still end up at 9-7 and will probably win the division, but I see us ending closer to 11-5. I'm sure we will lose one that I think we'll win, and we will probably win one of our next three. Best case scenario that I see? 13-3 with us losing to GB and winning the rest (I just have a bad feeling about being in GB with Rodgers against us, especially if Lacy gets going).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the browns are not a gimme game. they're like 5 points from beinh undefeated right now

 

Sorry, typical assumption about the Browns on my part. I do see us winning though since it will be a home game for us at the end of the season where we are always at our strongest. The best weapon for the Browns is their TE, and we have TD and Luke. I think we match up very well with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the browns are not a gimme game. they're like 5 points from beinh undefeated right now

 

Sorry, typical assumption about the Browns on my part. I do see us winning though since it will be a home game for us at the end of the season where we are always at our strongest. The best weapon for the Browns is their TE, and we have TD and Luke. I think we match up very well with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giants just beat the snot out of the Redskins on the road the other week.

 

At the end of the day, considering how we looked against Pittsburgh and Baltimore (and no matter what anyone wants to blame it on, it DID happen), there is no way anyone can consider a game against New Orleans a gimme.  No game against Brees and Payton is a gimme game, no matter how much we may or may not like them.

 

Now do I think we will win that game?  I don't know, possibly.  New Orleans on the road on a short week isn't a good mix.  But it will still be a game we have to be at our best for.  It's a division foe who will be clawing for the playoffs just like we will be.  

 

By this logic, we might as well say Tampa at home isn't a gimme either. No, no game is guaranteed but I'm liking our chances very much in all 3 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By this logic, we might as well say Tampa at home isn't a gimme either. No, no game is guaranteed but I'm liking our chances very much in all 3 games.

 

It isn't about a game being guaranteed.  I know what a gimme game is.  The Seattle Seahawks playing the Jacksonville Jaguars are what you would consider a gimme game.  The Denver Broncos playing the Oakland Raiders are what you would consider a gimme game.

 

You are simply overrating the Panthers by thinking a game against the Saints is a gimme.  It won't be easy at all, and likely will come down to the wire.  But this team just got stomped by Pittsburgh at home and Baltimore and while we overcame our flaws vs. Chicago... the flaws were still there.  We just haven't proven we are good enough to consider a game against Drew Brees and Sean Payton and a game against the feisty Cleveland Browns a gimme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is my conspiracy theory.. I think Rivera is playing chess not checkers. Im thinking they arent overly concerned winning against AFC teams as they are winning against NFC teams. No im not saying we dont try to win the AFC ones, im just saying that maybe we focus more on the NFC teams so incase we dont win the division we have both head to head tie breakers and conference record tie breakers with other potential wild card teams. We are 3-0 in the NFC now and 0-2 against AFC teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To understand why a player with all the tools to be successful in the NFL would bust is remarkably difficult.  While Isaiah Simmons has had a disappointing career to this point, there is a reason he is back in Carolina.  Yes, special teams are important and he does well in that role.  My intent is to examine in what situations he has been successful and develop a theory about the reason he might have experienced success in some capacity vs. the times he has flopped.  Is he a CB?  A Safety?  A LB?  An Edge?  No.  He has been all of them at some point and has yet to settle into a position.  I think the Panthers will do the same thing.  I think I know (besides special teams) how they might use him effectively on defense.  First, think of Simmons as a unicorn. Create a position that he does not have to fit into, but one that fits into his skill sets.  I think we need to designate him as our Big Nickel, and then we need to modify that position into something of a rover, for lack of a better term.  He is a hybrid--but lets not make him the hybrid, let's make the position the hybrid.  Isaiah Simmons has been most effective in the NFL as a Big Nickel and on special teams, specifically in sub-packages where he can leverage his elite speed (4.39 40-yard dash) without the constant physical demands of a traditional linebacker.  A big nickel is a third safety, designed to match up with the big TEs, basically, and provide better run support.   Based on what I have read, Simmons is slowed when he has to know the Xs and Os and the position is focused on complex interpretations that may require adjustments in certain situations, etc.  He excels in special teams, for example, because he is turned loose and he simple reacts to what he sees in front of him, it seems.   I think the Panthers may create a big nickel role that turns him loose on defense.       Simmons has been in the league for about 6 years and has been issued five playbooks.  His position has shifted in an effort to find where he could best fit in.  Getting back to basics, here is a chart that demonstrates how much more effective he was as a big nickel than a traditional LB, that required more reading blocking and run game schemes:     Last season, Ransom was the big nickel, the Panthers are high on him and not looking to replace him by any means.  It is my theory that Ransom will be used alongside Moehrig in some situations.  He can also provide depth behind Moehrig.  It is also my opinion that Simmons may not be the ideal fit for every situation involving the big nickel.  Simmons could be used, for example, as a blitzing big nickel who can cover the flat and stuff the run, while Ransom may be the better lock-down TE coverage guy--I dunno.  But I see Simmons playing a bigger role on D.   Here is a comparison between Ransom and Simmons: Lathan Ransom: A 2025 fourth-round pick, he is viewed as a starter candidate to provide security opposite safety Tre'von Moehrig, with the Panthers high on his potential. Isaiah Simmons: Recently re-signed (March 2026), Simmons has thrived as a special teams ace but is considered a prime candidate to develop into a big nickel linebacker/safety hybrid due to his unique versatility. Context: The Panthers' defense under Ejiro Evero requires safety depth, and both players bring different strengths to that position group. Throw in Nick Scott, a pure free safety who just signed, it is starting to get a bit clearer.  Does this mean we will not draft a S?  Not at all.  Who do we have to give depth at FS?  Let's hope its Scott. It is my view that Simmons needs to find one or two things he does well on this defense and focus on that and not everything else.  What are his natural talents (6'4" 238 and runs sub 4.4--who does that?  Can you not make that work for you?)  This tells me the problem is mental.  Too many cooks in the kitchen.  Instead of asking him to do everything behind the DL, let's get him to do one thing that aligns with his skill set and history of success.  A situational big nickel/rover seems to be a fit.    
    • Who had us getting arguably the best receiver in the draft last April? Dan believes in sticking with his board. That's what the Panthers will do. It's that simple.
×
×
  • Create New...