Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spiderman Connected to MCU

PandaPancake

By PandaPancake,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
Posted

 

So a recent rumor suggests that Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios are talking aboutconnecting Spider-Man with The Avengers. While these rumors have exploded since the most recent report, these rumors have actually been going around for a couple of years. In fact, at one time, there was supposedly a plan to include the Oscorp Tower in the firstAvengers movie.

Now, Entertainment Weekly has weighed in to both sort of discredit the rumors and also confirm them in a way. In regards to if Spider-Man will be joining the Avengers on the big screen in the near future, EW says their sources confirm that will not be the case. However, EW then goes on to claim that according to their sources it’s a possibility down the road.

According to their report, Sony isn’t interested in sharing Spider-Man at the moment. Sony is reportedly definitely going ahead with Sinister Six. The studio has a great writer/director in Drew Goddard, so they seem to be confident that he can produce a Spider-Man spinoff that will be a hit with audiences.

However, if Sinister Six flops, then reportedly Sony could consider doing a deal with Marvel Studios. Of course, this is nothing different than most fans without sources have speculated online. Sony has to make a film utilizing the Spider-Man characters every three years in order to retain the license. We’re assuming that Sinister Six will include Spider-Man in some form or fashion and will count as a Spider-Man film.

 

 

http://comicbook.com/2014/10/08/rumors-on-what-has-to-happen-for-spider-man-to-join-the-avengers/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Don't know why Spiderman is so hard for Sony to get right. there are reports that they may reboot it again after Spiderman 2 didn't sit too well with critics and didn't make the money they had hoped for.

 

Spiderman 2 was Superman Returns. We really wanted it to be good but it wasn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

at this point I'd rather spiderman go back to mcu AFTER avengers 3....trust me I hate sony for pretty much butchering spiderman and would love him to be part of the MCU, but at this point it wouldn't make any sense and would screw up the dynamic they are building 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CCS Newbie

CCS

Posted
Posted

I'm 100% opposite of those guys who think that if it isn't Marvel studios produced it's poo. But I 100% support Marvel getting the rights back to Spider-Man. Sony has fuged up way too often for me to have faith in them anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'm 100% opposite of those guys who think that if it isn't Marvel studios produced it's poo. But I 100% support Marvel getting the rights back to Spider-Man. Sony has fuged up way too often for me to have faith in them anymore.

 

We just would like our characters to freely move through the MCU like they do in the comics.

 

HD44.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      Go after Shedeur this offseason.

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I think you misunderstand what I mean by "significantly better than Bryce Young." That gets you entry into the top 30 NFL starting QB's. Not sure if you have seen that group recently, but it's not a strong one the further down that list you go. Murray is a Tier 3 if not Tier 4 QB in my book.
    • CRA
      First 4 NFL starts - Tyler Shough

      By CRA · Posted

      Here is where you are… for purely the sake of arguing with me you are willing to suggest the 2025 Saints RBs might not be better than the 2025 Panthers RBs lol Saints have the 28th ranked rush attack.  We are top 10.   The Saints haven’t had a 100 yard rusher the entire season.  We have seen franchise best performances in a franchise known for running the rock. and see above for what our OL is also clearly better than the Saints.  Hell, Canales being forced into some mashups has often made it even stronger at times 
    • kungfoodude
      Go after Shedeur this offseason.

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I am not saying there isn't truth to that but the economics and reality of the NFL are producing that. It's very hard to justify taking a guy in the 1st round, shelving him for years, having to make a contract extension and THEN hoping it all turns out okay. Not to mention, imagine that scenario after what we traded for Bryce. One thing is for certain, the QB desperation has led to bad 1st round QB picks for 15+ years now. That ain't new.  I think we need to decide on Bryce's future this offseason and we will have to. In my eyes, picking up the 5th year option is the "all-in" move for a two year period. That means you are committed to him in the medium term. Not the move I would personally make.  No matter what the decision is, I have been vocal about needing to bring in multiple QB's to improve that QB room for when Bryce falters again. How about just overall improving your team depth so that when it doesn't pan out, you at least have options on the roster? I don't feel like that is too much to ask and it's a valid bet hedge. 
×
×
  • Create New...