Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spiderman Connected to MCU

PandaPancake

By PandaPancake,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
Posted

 

So a recent rumor suggests that Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios are talking aboutconnecting Spider-Man with The Avengers. While these rumors have exploded since the most recent report, these rumors have actually been going around for a couple of years. In fact, at one time, there was supposedly a plan to include the Oscorp Tower in the firstAvengers movie.

Now, Entertainment Weekly has weighed in to both sort of discredit the rumors and also confirm them in a way. In regards to if Spider-Man will be joining the Avengers on the big screen in the near future, EW says their sources confirm that will not be the case. However, EW then goes on to claim that according to their sources it’s a possibility down the road.

According to their report, Sony isn’t interested in sharing Spider-Man at the moment. Sony is reportedly definitely going ahead with Sinister Six. The studio has a great writer/director in Drew Goddard, so they seem to be confident that he can produce a Spider-Man spinoff that will be a hit with audiences.

However, if Sinister Six flops, then reportedly Sony could consider doing a deal with Marvel Studios. Of course, this is nothing different than most fans without sources have speculated online. Sony has to make a film utilizing the Spider-Man characters every three years in order to retain the license. We’re assuming that Sinister Six will include Spider-Man in some form or fashion and will count as a Spider-Man film.

 

 

http://comicbook.com/2014/10/08/rumors-on-what-has-to-happen-for-spider-man-to-join-the-avengers/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Don't know why Spiderman is so hard for Sony to get right. there are reports that they may reboot it again after Spiderman 2 didn't sit too well with critics and didn't make the money they had hoped for.

 

Spiderman 2 was Superman Returns. We really wanted it to be good but it wasn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

at this point I'd rather spiderman go back to mcu AFTER avengers 3....trust me I hate sony for pretty much butchering spiderman and would love him to be part of the MCU, but at this point it wouldn't make any sense and would screw up the dynamic they are building 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CCS Newbie

CCS

Posted
Posted

I'm 100% opposite of those guys who think that if it isn't Marvel studios produced it's poo. But I 100% support Marvel getting the rights back to Spider-Man. Sony has fuged up way too often for me to have faith in them anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaPancake Newbie

PandaPancake

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'm 100% opposite of those guys who think that if it isn't Marvel studios produced it's poo. But I 100% support Marvel getting the rights back to Spider-Man. Sony has fuged up way too often for me to have faith in them anymore.

 

We just would like our characters to freely move through the MCU like they do in the comics.

 

HD44.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DavidEng
      Canes vs Flyers Gm 3 Rd 2 8pm

      By DavidEng · Posted

      It’s like being on the Flyers broadcast team feed so far
    • philit99
      Canes vs Flyers Gm 3 Rd 2 8pm

      By philit99 · Posted

      Boy the flyers look good early. Lots of bad plays and slow start by our team. Hope that changes before the score changes.
    • strato
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By strato · Posted

      I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes into account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as another treading water year (at QB). I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room (behind him anyway). Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. That’s how I look at it. 
×
×
  • Create New...