Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spiderman Connected to MCU


PandaPancake

Recommended Posts

Andrew Garfield makes Tobey Maguire look tough.

Think about that for a second.

I know Spiderman isn't supposed to be a big tough super hero, but come on

 

I've hated a fair number of comic movie casting choices that turned out great (Heath Ledger, Robert Downey and Tobey Maguire among them).

 

Andrew Garfield is an exception.  I hated him as Spider Man and still do.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Related Note: Hollywood has long had a habit of casting 'young looking' people in their mid-20s or older as teenagers (Garfield is 31, for pete's sake).

 

I'd say there's enough talented young actors out there that you don't need to do this crap anymore.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Related Note: Hollywood has long had a habit of casting 'young looking' people in their mid-20s or older as teenagers (Garfield is 31, for pete's sake).

I'd say there's enough talented young actors out there that you don't need to do this crap anymore.

That's more about labor laws than anything. Once they're 18 you can work them like an adult

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of Hulk, these guys are lucky Hulk was in outer space during the Civil War. He just would have fugged everybody up

He came back and did.

We were discussing RDJ and his contract at work. Iron Man could become a minor character in the MCU. By only having him doing voiceover work and inside helmet shots you would cut down on his fee and his time devoted to the part

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He came back and did.

We were discussing RDJ and his contract at work. Iron Man could become a minor character in the MCU. By only having him doing voiceover work and inside helmet shots you would cut down on his fee and his time devoted to the part

That's smart. What do you do when Chris Evans contract is up though? He said he's retiring after that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's smart. What do you do when Chris Evans contract is up though? He said he's retiring after that

When Captain America died, after Civil War, Bucky had Dr Strange sneak him into the helicarrier and he stole the shield and took on the role of Captain America. Any major character in Marvel could retire after their deal is done.

With Warmachine and Hulk we see Marvel isn't afraid to replace an actor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you misunderstand what I mean by "significantly better than Bryce Young." That gets you entry into the top 30 NFL starting QB's. Not sure if you have seen that group recently, but it's not a strong one the further down that list you go. Murray is a Tier 3 if not Tier 4 QB in my book.
    • Here is where you are… for purely the sake of arguing with me you are willing to suggest the 2025 Saints RBs might not be better than the 2025 Panthers RBs lol Saints have the 28th ranked rush attack.  We are top 10.   The Saints haven’t had a 100 yard rusher the entire season.  We have seen franchise best performances in a franchise known for running the rock. and see above for what our OL is also clearly better than the Saints.  Hell, Canales being forced into some mashups has often made it even stronger at times 
    • I am not saying there isn't truth to that but the economics and reality of the NFL are producing that. It's very hard to justify taking a guy in the 1st round, shelving him for years, having to make a contract extension and THEN hoping it all turns out okay. Not to mention, imagine that scenario after what we traded for Bryce. One thing is for certain, the QB desperation has led to bad 1st round QB picks for 15+ years now. That ain't new.  I think we need to decide on Bryce's future this offseason and we will have to. In my eyes, picking up the 5th year option is the "all-in" move for a two year period. That means you are committed to him in the medium term. Not the move I would personally make.  No matter what the decision is, I have been vocal about needing to bring in multiple QB's to improve that QB room for when Bryce falters again. How about just overall improving your team depth so that when it doesn't pan out, you at least have options on the roster? I don't feel like that is too much to ask and it's a valid bet hedge. 
×
×
  • Create New...