Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Press Coverage


cs36620

Recommended Posts

I just read on here how some Giants fan posted on their boards that we will slaughter them (putting it in a nice way). However, I have (among many) glaring differences between us and the Dallas D that mean swing the game towards (unfortunately) the Giants favor. I truly believe that Eli will have a much better game than he had against Dallas simply because we rarely (if ever) run bump 'n run or press coverage.

We usually line up a good 5-8 yards from opposing receivers and I believe that may hurt us this game simply because it seemed like no one was getting open last night against Dallas and they were consistently running bump coverage.

Not sure if this has been mentioned yet, but I think it's worth thinking about this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we should do ok, i think. trgo, for his faults, seems to have made very good adjustments to the coverage. we actually played a good bit of press coverage against TB and limited them greatly (the majority of their passing yardage came on three huge plays; you could make the case that the press coverage allowed it, but i dont think it's a strong arguement, because of admittedly-blown assignments.)

the first drive vs. denver was scary, but how often did you see recievers open during the last 45:00 of the game? the db's did a fantastic job of clamping down on routes. if we can do the same against NY, and limit the big play, we should be good.

oh and i call harris' first pick of the season on sunday. :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't even know what to think about this game, it really could be down to which team shows up.

Do the bad Giants or good Giants show up, or does the Good Panthers or bad Panthers show up?

We have been average at best this year on the road, is this the game we break out and show we can dominate on the road?

I really have no idea what is going to happen in this game, but it has the potential to be a defensive slug fest in the area of 6-10 in points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made a comment about this in another thread and whole heartedly agree with you. Did the Giants implode on themselves last night, or did the Dallas D eat the Giants for a snack? A lot of a team's performance is due, in part, to the opposition's performance. Can we mach the Dallas tenacity or assist in the Giants revival? Afterall, they played two tough divisional opponents. They'll be looking for redemption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just read on here how some Giants fan posted on their boards that we will slaughter them (putting it in a nice way). However, I have (among many) glaring differences between us and the Dallas D that mean swing the game towards (unfortunately) the Giants favor. I truly believe that Eli will have a much better game than he had against Dallas simply because we rarely (if ever) run bump 'n run or press coverage.

We usually line up a good 5-8 yards from opposing receivers and I believe that may hurt us this game simply because it seemed like no one was getting open last night against Dallas and they were consistently running bump coverage.

Not sure if this has been mentioned yet, but I think it's worth thinking about this week.

Dallas lined up in a 3-4 too. Should we copy that as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delhommey,

I am not a hater, i'm just merely mentioning the fact that we don't usually use a lot of press coverage, and it seemed to work against the Giants. Now, with Jacobs being back in the game, it could change things, but i'm just saying that maybe it would benefit us to use some more press coverage in this game.

Now, no i don't think we should go with your smart ass comment on copying the 3-4, because we don't have the personel (sp?) for it. However, i don't know if you've realized, but this is a copy-cat league (wildcat formation, zone blitzing formation, etc. etc.) so i believe i make a valid argument for using the press a bit more.

I do wholeheartidly agree with everyone elses comments on the defense doing pretty well with their schemes recently so i'm hoping this keeps up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry. One loses their patience after the 5,436,768 thread about the CB's playing off the receivers.

We're as likely to use press coverage the whole game as we are to be in the 3-4 or play 5 wide.

I see you're new so I apologize if you haven't seen this covered here before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...